1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.7933/2021
BETWEEN
SRI. YOGARAJU
S/O. GOWDEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
NO.615, MARUTHI MARKET
AVENUE ROAD
BENGALURU 3 560 002
... PETITIONER
[BY SRI. HARISH O.K., ADVOCATE]
AND
SRI. PRAKASH R.G.
S/O. GOVINDASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.299/1
VEERANNANAPALYA ROAD
GOVINDAPURA
BANGALORE 3 560 045
... RESPONDENT
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF
CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASH/SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER
PASSED BY THE XXIV ASCJ AND XXII A.C.M.M., BENGALURU IN
C.C.NO.4291/2019, DATED 23.08.2021 PASSED ON I.A.SEC.143(A)
OF N.I. ACT.
2
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
The petitioner is before this Court calling in question an
order dated 23.08.2021 passed by the XXIV ASCJ and XXII
ACMM, Bangalore in C.C.No.4291/2019, whereby the learned
Magistrate dismisses the application filed under Section 143A of
the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as
8the said Act9 for short) for its non-prosecution.
2.
Heard Sri. Harish O.K., learned counsel appearing for
the petitioner.
3.
The petitioner registers a private complaint invoking
Section 200 of Cr.P.C., for offence punishable under Section 138
of the said Act on the ground that the cheque for an amount of
Rs.7.00 lakhs issued by the respondent is returned for want of
sufficient funds. In the proceeding initiated before the competent
court, the petitioner files an application under Section 143A of
the said Act.
3
4.
The matter was taken up on the application on
14.07.2021 and on 17.09.2021. On 17.09.2021, the matter was
directed to be listed on 23.08.2021. Noticing the absence of the
petitioner or his representative before the Court, the Court
rejects the application seeking interim compensation in terms of
the Section 143A of the said Act for its non-prosecution. The
period in which the matters be taken up were all periods when
the Standard Operating Procedure with regard to COVID-19 was
in operation, above all, the application ought to have been
decided on its merit either ways and not dismissing the same for
its non-prosecution. The order dismissing the application is thus
rendered unsustainable as it defeats the purport of Section 143A
of the said Act.
5.
For the aforesaid reasons, the following:
ORDER
i.
Criminal Petition is allowed.
4
ii.
The order dated 23.08.2021 passed by the XXIV
ASCJ
and
XXII
ACMM,
Bengaluru
in
C.C.No.4291/2019, stands quashed.
iii.
The application filed by the petitioner under Section
143A of the said Act shall be considered by the
learned Magistrate and appropriate orders be passed
in
accordance
with
law
and
after
affording
opportunity of hearing to both the parties.
Sd/-
JUDGE
SJK
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.