- 1 -
CRL.P No. 103108 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 103108 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
RAM SHIVPRASAD S/O JAYARAM
ALIAS SHRI SHIVAPRASADRAV RAMARAV
AGE. 57 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE,
R/O. DIVAGERI, MAVALLI-2,
MURDESHWAR, TQ. BHATKAL,
DIST. UTTAR KANNADA-581388
&PETITIONER
(BY SRI. HAREESHA S NAYAK, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH MURDESHWAR POLICE STATION,
TQ. BHATKAL, DIST. UTTAR KANNADA
BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING, DHARWAD-580001
&RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. PRASHANT V. MOGALI, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 438 OF CR.P.C.,
SEEKING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.3 ON
ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN MURUDESHWAR P.S. CRIME NO.108/2022
REGISTERED BY THE MURUDESHWAR POLICE STATION FOR
OFFENCES ALLEGED SECTION 370A(2) OF IPC AND U/S 3, 4, 5
AND 6 OF IMMORAL TRAFFIC PREVENTION ACT, AND DIRECT THE
RESPONDENT ACCORDINGLY.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
- 2 -
CRL.P No. 103108 of 2022
This petition is filed by accused No.3 under
Section 438 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
(hereinafter referred to as the 8Cr.P.C.9, for brevity)
seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No.108/2022 of
Murudeshwar
Police
Station
registered
for
the
offences punishable under Sections 370A(2) of the
Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as 8IPC9,
for brevity) and Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 of Immoral
Traffic Prevention Act.
2.
The case of the prosecution is that, one
Sri.Mahabaleshwar S.N., CPI, Bhatkal Rural Circle,
has filed the complaint stating that, on 19.09.2022
at
about
12.30pm
at
Shivakrupa
Lodge,
Murudeshwar, the accused colluding together, to
have illegal gain, by misusing the position of the
victim
girls,
called
them
to
Shivakrupa
lodge,
Murudeshwar and kept them in the said lodge for
prostitution
and
collected
amount
from
the
- 3 -
customers. The complainant when conducted raid at
the said lodge, accused Nos.1 and 2 have been
caught red handed and accused No.2 disclosed that
this
petitioner/accused
No.3
knows
running
of
prostitution in the lodge. The said complaint came to
be registered in Crime No.108/2022 by Murudeshwar
Police for the aforesaid offences. The petitioner,
who
is
arrayed
as
accused
No.3
in
the
FIR,
apprehending
his
arrest,
had
filed
Criminal
Miscellaneous No.406/2022 seeking anticipatory bail
and the same came to be rejected by the learned
Principal
District
and
Sessions
Judge,
Uttara
Kannada,
Karwar,
by
order
dated
10.10.2022.
Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court seeking
anticipatory bail.
3.
Heard
the
arguments
of
the
learned
counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned
High Court Government Pleader for the respondent-
State.
- 4 -
4.
The learned counsel for the petitioner
would contended that the petitioner is not aware of
any prostitution being run in the lodge which he and
accused No.2 are running on lease basis. It is his
further submission that this petitioner/accused No.3
was not present at the time of the raid by the
complainant.
The
main
allegation
are
against
accused Nos.1 and 2 and they have been granted
bail
by
the
Sessions
Court.
Therefore,
this
petitioner is entitled for grant of bail on the ground
of parity. The offences alleged against the petitioner
are not punishable with death or imprisonment for
life. The petitioner is ready to co-operate with the
police in the investigation. With this, he prayed to
allow the petition.
5.
Per contra, learned High Court Government
Pleader
would
contend
that
investigation
is
in
progress. The petitioner is required for custodial
interrogation. This petitioner along with accused
No.2 is running the said lodge on lease basis. If the
- 5 -
petitioner
is
granted
anticipatory
bail,
he
will
hamper the investigation and tamper the prosecution
witnesses.
With
this,
he
prayed
to
reject
the
petition.
6.
Having regard to the submission made by
the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned High Court Government Pleader, this Court
has gone through the averments of the complaint,
FIR and the order passed by the Sessions Court.
7.
The case of the prosecution is that, two
women
were
kept
in
Shivakrupa
lodge,
Murudeshwar, for the purpose of prostitution and
accused Nos.1 and 2 were caught red handed when
raid was conducted by the complainant. Accused
No.2 along with this petitioner/accused No.3 is
running the said lodge on lease basis. Accused Nos.1
and 2 are running prostitution for earning money.
This petitioner/accused No.3 was not present in the
lodge at the time of raid. Accused Nos.1 and 2
- 6 -
against whom, serious allegations are made, have
been granted bail by the Sessions Court. Merely
because this petitioner has filed application for
anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. is not
a ground to reject the petition when accused Nos.1
and 2 have been granted bail under Section 439
Cr.P.C. The offences alleged against the petitioner
are not punishable with death or imprisonment for
life except the offence unde
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.