SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 52642

K.N. BALARAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Chargesheet was filed against petitioner-accused

No.7 and others alleging that when the accused No.7

was working as Administrative Officer of the Gram

Panchayath concerned has misappropriated a sum of

Rs.6,710/-.

2.

Learned

Magistrate

after

accepting

the

charge sheet took cognizance of the offences punishable

under Sections 408, 409 read with Section 34 of IPC and

issued summons to the petitioner-accused. Hence this

petition.

3

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits

that the petitioner is alleged to have committed the

offences when he was discharging duty of Administrative

Officer of the Gram Panchayath concerned and the

charge sheet was filed without obtaining sanction as

specified in Section 197 of Cr.P.C. Hence, he submits

that the order taking cognizance against the petitioner-

accused stands vitiated for non compliance of Section

197 of Cr.P.C. In support he places reliance on the

decision of Hon9ble Apex Court in the case of

D. Devaraja vs Owais Sabeer Hussain reported in

(2020) 7 SCC 695.

4.

Learned High Court Government Pleader

appearing for the respondent-State submits that the

petitioner-accused having misappropriated the amount,

the police

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top