- 1 -
CRL.P No.100482 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100482 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
SMT. POOJA D/O. ANNASABB KADDUNNAVAR,
AGE 27 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE,
R/O: KUSUNAL, TQ: CHIKODI
CORRECT ADDRESS
SMT. POOJA W/O. KAUSTUBH MUNNOLLI,
AGE 27 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE,
R/O: UGAR ROAD, KUDACHI, TQ: CHIKODI,
RAIBAG, DIST BELAGAVI
& PETITIONER
(BY SRI.NEELENDRA D.GUNDE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY KAGWAD POLICE,
REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING, DHARWAD.
2.
PRIYANT DILIP ANKALGE,
AGE 33 YEARS, OCC: FARMER
R/O: KUSUNAL, TQ: CHIKODI,
DIST: BELAGAVI-591316.
& RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. GIRIJA HIREMATH, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI. RAKESH HATTIKATAGI, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C.,
SEEKING TO QUASH FIR AND COMPLAINT IN CRIME NO.173/2021,
DATED 21.10.2021 REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE
U/S.306 WITH THE KAGWAD POLICE PENDING ON THE FILE OF CIVIL
JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KAGWAD, IN SO FAR AS PETITIONER IS
CONCERNED.
- 2 -
CRL.P No.100482 of 2022
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING.
The instant petition is filed with a prayer to quash the
complaint and FIR in Crime No.173/2021, dated 21.10.2021
registered for the offence punishable under Section 306 of IPC
with Kagwad Police pending on the file of the Civil Judge and
JMFC Court, Kagwad.
The petitioner is alleged to have had certain financial
transactions with one Smt. Sunita, the mother of respondent
No.2/complainant. In this regard on 20.10.2021, there were
certain heated exchange of words between the petitioner and the
mother of respondent No.2 and it is stated that petitioner while
leaving the place told the mother of respondent No.2 that, if she
cannot repay the money, she should go and die somewhere. It is
further submitted that, on the evening of 20.10.2021, the
complainant could not find his mother in the house and found a
letter written by her in which she has stated that the petitioner is
wrongly claiming certain amounts from her which is not due from
her and that she has recorded a portion of conversation in the
- 3 -
mobile, threatening to expose her and malign her reputation and
she is being blackmailed and for that reason she is committing
suicide. Later, they found the dead body of the mother of
respondent No.2 in the river. Hence, the complaint has been
lodged against the petitioner herein by respondent No.2 by
requesting respondent Nos.1 to 4 to initiate action against the
petitioner under Section 306 of the IPC.
3.
It is submitted by the petitioner that the allegation of
respondent No.2 in the complaint as well as the contents of the
alleged suicide note written by the deceased were to be
considered as true, still they do not constitute an offence under
Section 306 of IPC.
4.
Advocate for the respondents submit that the said
allegation does constitute an offence and furthermore, this Court
cannot arrive at a conclusion whether to quash the proceeding or
not at this stage itself before completion of investigation and
filing of charge sheet. For the said reason, it is prayed that the
petition be dismissed.
5.
The case of the complainant is that there was a quarrel
between petitioner and his mother where the petitioner wrongly
- 4 -
demanded repayment of money from her mother when there
was no such due, that she recorded portion of the conversation
and blackmailed her and threatened to reveal the same to others
and that while leaving the place told her that if she does not
repay their money, she should go and die somewhere, which
resulted in sufficient instigation to the mother of the complainant
to commit suicide.
6.
What is to be looked into is whether presuming the
aforementioned events to be true, does it constitute an offence
as per section 306 of IPC. Given peculiar facts and circumstances
of the case, it is highly improbable that the Police can come up
with any other material other than what has been alleged in the
complaint, after investigation.
7.
Section 306 in The Indian Penal Code, reads as follows:
<306. Abetment of suicide.4If any person
commits
suicide,
whoever
abets
the
commission of such suicide, shall be punished
with imprisonment of either description for a
term which may extend to ten years, and shall
also be liable to fine.=
- 5 -
8.
Thus, what has to be looked into is presuming the
allegations against the petitioner are true, whether her alleged
conduct abetted the deceased for committing suicide. In the
instant case, the petitioner has not assisted the deceased in
committing the suicide.
9.
Under the circumstances, it has to be considered whether
her actions amounts to sufficient instigation for the deceased to
commit suicide. Even presuming that the allegations made
against the petitioner are true, she will be guilty of the following:
1. Demanding money from the deceased when there
was no due.
2. Recording a portion of the conversation and telling
her that she will reveal it to others.
3. While leaving the place, telling her that if, she
does not repay her money, she should go and die
somewhere.
10.
The act of th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.