Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the

learned counsel for respondent No.1.

2.

This appeal is filed by the Insurance Company

challenging the judgment and award dated 15.10.2015, passed

in M.V.C.No.3052/2014, on the file of the II Additional Small

Causes Judge and XXVIII ACMM, MACT, Bengaluru (8the Tribunal9

for short) questioning the quantum of compensation.

3.

The factual matrix of the case of the claimant before

the Tribunal is that he met with an accident on 14.05.2014 and

3

suffered fracture of both the bones and he was an inpatient from

14.05.2014 to 18.05.2014. In support of his contention that he

had suffered the fracture and suffered from disability, he

examined himself as P.W.1 and examined the doctor as P.W.3,

who assessed the disability of 47.16% to the right lower limb

and 16% to the whole body. The Tribunal accepted the same

and calculated the future loss of income and awarded

compensation Rs.14,12,600/- and hence the present appeal is

filed by the Insurance Company.

4.

The learned counsel for the appellant Insurance

Company submits that the Tribunal has committed an error in

accepting the case of the claimant and awarded exorbitant

compensation consi