KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
SRI E R SATYANAGARAJ – Appellant
Versus
SRI E R SUDEEP – Respondent
This captioned appeal is filed by the defendant No.4
questioning the judgment and decree dated 26.09.2018
passed on I.A.No.19 filed by defendant No.2 under Order VII
Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 in O.S.No.146
of 2013 on the file of Court of Senior Civil Judge and JMFC,
Gowribidanuru, Chickaballapura District, rejecting the plaint
filed by the plaintiff.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred
as per their rank before the Trial Court.
3. The brief facts leading to the case are as under:
The plaintiff has instituted a suit in O.S.No.146/2013
seeking relief of partition and separate possession. The
defendant
No.4
claimed
that
he
has
contested
the
proceedings by filing a written statement. The Trial Court,
based on rival contentions has formulated issues after
completion of plaintiff9s evidence. The second defendant filed
an application in I.A.No.19 under Order 7 Rule 11(d) r/w
4
Section 151 of CPC by contending that Item Nos.6 to 8 of the
suit schedule property are subject matter of proceedings
pending before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (for short, 8DRT9),
Bengaluru and therefore, sought for rejection of the plaint.
The learned Judge, having he
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.