2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 39541
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
CRIMINAL PETITION No.9171/2022
BETWEEN:
ABDUL RASHEED,
S/O PAPA SAB,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
NO.20, 4TH CROSS, 9TH MAIN,
NEAR OM SHAKTHI TEMPLE,
SHANTHI NAGARA,
HOSANAGARA,
BENGALURU SOUTH,
BENGALURU - 560 027.
&.PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAJASHEKHARA K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE
RURAL POLICE STATION
SHIVAMOGGA - 577 202.
REPRESENTED BY SPP
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BENGALURU - 01.
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.K.NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION
438 OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO GRANT
ANTICIPATORY BAIL DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT POLICE
TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED ON BAIL IN THE
EVENT OF HIS ARREST IN CRIME NO.413/2016 LODGED BY
THE RESPONDENT POLICE AND COURT CC NO.670/2018
(CRIME
NO.106/2016)
ON
THE
FILE
OF
JMFC
III,
2
SHIVAMOGGA FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER
SECTION 420 READ WITH 34 OF IPC BY IMPOSING
NECESSARY CONDITIONS.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
This petition is filed by the petitioner/Accused under
Section 438 of Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail arising
out of Crime No.413/2016 in C.C.No.670/2018 registered
by Shivamogga Rural Police Station, pending on the file
of JMFC III Court in Shivamogga, for the offences
punishable under Section 420 of IPC.
2.
Heard the arguments advanced by the learned
counsel for the petitioner and learned HCGP for
respondent-State and perused the material on record.
3.
The brief factual matrix leading to the case are
that the complainant is said to be the wife of the present
petitioner/accused and married in the year 2010.
subsequently, the present petitioner along with one
Arshad pursued the complainant to pay Rs.3,00,000/- to
3
the accused with a promise that he is going to start a
business in Tumakuru and she was also pursued to give
her gold ornaments. Subsequently, accused did not
respond after going to Tumakuru and hence she lodged a
complaint making allegations of cheating.
4.
Initially crime was registered in Bhadravathi
Police Station and subsequently it was transferred to
Shivamogga Rural Police Station. The Investigating
Officer after investigating the crime has submitted charge
sheet against the present petitioner under Section 420 of
IPC. The petitioner was all along absconding and all
efforts to secure his presence went in vain. In charge
sheet also he is shown to be absconding while the other
accused Arshad referred in the F.I.R. was not sent for
trial.
The
charge
sheet
was
registered
in
C.C.No.670/2018 and warrant came to be issued and
warrant remained unexecuted all along. The learned
Magistrate was compelled to record the evidence of
material witnesses under Section 299 of Cr.P.C. to enable
4
the Court to register the case in LPR. Meanwhile in 2022
petitioner has filed this petition.
5.
Learned counsel for petitioner contended that
petitioner met with an accident and he is hospitalized and
he also contended that offences are exclusively triable by
Magistrate and undertakes to abide by the terms and
conditions to be imposed by this Court. He also invites
the
attention
of
this
Court
towards
inconsistent
statements given by the complainant before the Court
while recording the evidence.
6.
Learned HCGP for respondent-State opposed
the
bail
petition
and
contends
that
petitioner
is
absconding all along and as such he prays for rejection of
the bail petition.
7.
Having heard the arguments and perused the
records, it is evident that initially F.I.R. was lodged
against the present petitioner for the offences punishable
under Sections 406, 417, 420 read with Section 34 of
5
IPC. Subsequently, charge sheet was submitted under
Section 420 of IPC alone. The Charge sheet was
submitted on 26.07.2018 and it was registered in
C.C.No.670/2018. But however, records disclose that
petitioner was all along absconding for four years and the
warrant remain unexecuted. Hence, learned Magistrate
was compelled to record the evidence of material
witnesses under Section 299 of Cr.P.C.. The evidence
was recorded under Section 299 of Cr.P.C. on 24.10.2019
and also on 10.12.2019. It appears that matter has been
sent for LPR and since warrant is issued against the
present petitioner now he is coming before this Court.
8.
The conduct of the petitioner disclose that
since last six years he is all along absconding. The
evidence under Section 299 of Cr.P.C. was recorded and
endorsement on the F.I.R. disclose after obtaining the
permission of Principal District and Sessions Judge, LPR
was registered in 4/2020. This fact was also concealed.
All the material aspects have been concealed by the
6
petitioner. The matter in now registered in LPR and
petitioner is absconding since long time. Considering his
conduct he does not deserve any leniency so as to seek
anticipatory bail. Hence, petition is devoid of merits and
does not survive for consideration. His remedy is to
surrender before the learned Magistrate so as to re-open
the original ca