SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 32738

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2022

BEFORE

THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE B. M. SHYAM PRASAD

WRIT PETITION NO.9455/2022 (CS EL/M)

BETWEEN :

1.

SRI.C.UMESHA

S/O SRI CHIKKA THIMMAIAH

AGED 43 YEARS

R/AT 8, SHAMALA GOWDAIAH

SUBHASH NAGAR, THARABANAHALLI

HESARAGATTA MAIN ROAD,

BANGALORE - 560 090.

2.

SRI C S GOVINDARAJU

S/O SRI SIDDARANGAIAH S

AGED 35 YEARS

R/AT 17, 1ST F CROSS, 8TH MAIN

HEGGANAHALLI,

LAKSHMANAGARA

BANGALORE - 560 091.

3.

SRI IRAPPA SOMANNA SAJJAN

S/O SOMANNA SAJJAN

AGED 42 YEARS

NO. 26/4, 12TH MAIN, SHIVANAGARA

RAJAJINAGAR

BANGALORE - 560 010.

4.

SRI GOVINDARAJU C

S/O SRI CHIKKA THIMMAIAH

AGED 45 YEARS

2

R/AT 234, VINAYAKA LAYOUT

ULLAHAL, BANGALORE - 560 056.

... PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. R. A. DEVANAND, ADVOCATE)

AND :

1.

THE AIRCRAFT EMPLOYEES HOUSE BUILDING

CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,

NO.151, 1ST CROSS, CKC GARDEN,

K H ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 027

REPRESENTED BY ITS CEO

SRI B H BALAJI.

2.

THE ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR OF

CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY

NO.1, ALI ASKAR ROAD,

BANGALORE - 560 052.

... RESPONDENTS

(BY SMT.H.C. KAVITHA, HCGP FOR R2)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226

AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO

QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY R2 IN REFERENCE NO.

HSG-3:HHS339:2021-22 DATED 15.03.2022 WHICH IS

PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-G BY ALLOWING THIS WRIT

PETITION IN ENTIRETY.

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS,

THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

3

The petitioners are the elected directors of the

Aircraft Employees House Building Co-operative Society

Limited (the first respondent), and they have impugned

the second

respondent9s

order dated

15.03.2022

(Annexure-G). The second respondent, by this order,

has notified calendar of events for holding elections to

fill up the post that has fallen vacant on the demise of

Sri B.Narasimha Murthy, who was elected with the

petitioners to the Board in the elections held on

17.01.2021. It is undisputed that the calendar of

events

is

modified

subsequently

and

the

latest

modification is by the order dated 04.07.2022.

2. Sri R.A. Devanand, the learned Counsel for the

petitioners, submits that Sri B. Narasimha Murthy died

on 09.06.2021 and as of his death, he had not

completed half of the term of his tenure as a director

and therefore the Society must co-opt a Director in his

4

place and elections cannot be held to fill up such post.

He submits that the length of the remaining tenure of

the Board as of the date a post falls vacant would be

decisive for the purposes of holding election or co-

opting, and if the period is so computed, the Board

could co-opt to fill up the vacant post. The merits of

this contention must necessarily be examined in the

light of the provisions of Section 29E of the Karnataka

Cooperative Societies Act, 1959 which reads as under:

<29E. Filling up of casual vacancy in the

office of members of the [Board].- Any

vacancy in the office of members of the

[board] of a co-operative society by reason of

death, resignation, removal or otherwise,

shall be filled up in such manner as may be

specified in the bye-laws of such society.

Provided

that

the

co-operative

election

commission shall conduct the election to fill

up any vacancy in the office of the director of

the board if the remaining term of office of

the board is more than half of its original

term:

5

Provided further that the board may fill up a

casual vacancy on the board by nomination

out of the same class of member in respect of

which the casual vacancy has arisen, if the

remaining term of office of the board is less

than half of its original term:

Provided also that, if the Board fails to fill up

such casual vacancy within three months of

the date of occurrence, the Registrar shall fill

up through nomination.=

3. The crucial expression in both the first and the

second proviso to Section 29E is <original term=. In the

first

proviso

to

Section

29E,

the

Co-

operative Election Commission shall hold elections to fill

up a casual vacancy if the remaining term of the Board

is more than half of its original term and the second

proviso contemplates cooption in the case of a casual

vacancy if the remaining term of the office of the Board

is less than half of its original term. If the crucial

expression, for the purposes of computation to decide

whether there must be election or the co-option, is

8original term9, it must necessarily relate to the date of

the constitution of the Board at the first instance. The

6

date on which the post falls vacant would not be the

real test to compute. Therefore, the petitioners cannot

succeed on the grounds urged and the petition must

fail. The petition stands rejected accordingly.

Sd/-

JUDGE

nv

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top