IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2022
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE B. M. SHYAM PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO.9455/2022 (CS EL/M)
BETWEEN :
1.
SRI.C.UMESHA
S/O SRI CHIKKA THIMMAIAH
AGED 43 YEARS
R/AT 8, SHAMALA GOWDAIAH
SUBHASH NAGAR, THARABANAHALLI
HESARAGATTA MAIN ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 090.
2.
SRI C S GOVINDARAJU
S/O SRI SIDDARANGAIAH S
AGED 35 YEARS
R/AT 17, 1ST F CROSS, 8TH MAIN
HEGGANAHALLI,
LAKSHMANAGARA
BANGALORE - 560 091.
3.
SRI IRAPPA SOMANNA SAJJAN
S/O SOMANNA SAJJAN
AGED 42 YEARS
NO. 26/4, 12TH MAIN, SHIVANAGARA
RAJAJINAGAR
BANGALORE - 560 010.
4.
SRI GOVINDARAJU C
S/O SRI CHIKKA THIMMAIAH
AGED 45 YEARS
2
R/AT 234, VINAYAKA LAYOUT
ULLAHAL, BANGALORE - 560 056.
... PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. R. A. DEVANAND, ADVOCATE)
AND :
1.
THE AIRCRAFT EMPLOYEES HOUSE BUILDING
CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,
NO.151, 1ST CROSS, CKC GARDEN,
K H ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 027
REPRESENTED BY ITS CEO
SRI B H BALAJI.
2.
THE ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR OF
CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY
NO.1, ALI ASKAR ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 052.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT.H.C. KAVITHA, HCGP FOR R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY R2 IN REFERENCE NO.
HSG-3:HHS339:2021-22 DATED 15.03.2022 WHICH IS
PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-G BY ALLOWING THIS WRIT
PETITION IN ENTIRETY.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS,
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
3
The petitioners are the elected directors of the
Aircraft Employees House Building Co-operative Society
Limited (the first respondent), and they have impugned
the second
respondent9s
order dated
15.03.2022
(Annexure-G). The second respondent, by this order,
has notified calendar of events for holding elections to
fill up the post that has fallen vacant on the demise of
Sri B.Narasimha Murthy, who was elected with the
petitioners to the Board in the elections held on
17.01.2021. It is undisputed that the calendar of
events
is
modified
subsequently
and
the
latest
modification is by the order dated 04.07.2022.
2. Sri R.A. Devanand, the learned Counsel for the
petitioners, submits that Sri B. Narasimha Murthy died
on 09.06.2021 and as of his death, he had not
completed half of the term of his tenure as a director
and therefore the Society must co-opt a Director in his
4
place and elections cannot be held to fill up such post.
He submits that the length of the remaining tenure of
the Board as of the date a post falls vacant would be
decisive for the purposes of holding election or co-
opting, and if the period is so computed, the Board
could co-opt to fill up the vacant post. The merits of
this contention must necessarily be examined in the
light of the provisions of Section 29E of the Karnataka
Cooperative Societies Act, 1959 which reads as under:
<29E. Filling up of casual vacancy in the
office of members of the [Board].- Any
vacancy in the office of members of the
[board] of a co-operative society by reason of
death, resignation, removal or otherwise,
shall be filled up in such manner as may be
specified in the bye-laws of such society.
Provided
that
the
co-operative
election
commission shall conduct the election to fill
up any vacancy in the office of the director of
the board if the remaining term of office of
the board is more than half of its original
term:
5
Provided further that the board may fill up a
casual vacancy on the board by nomination
out of the same class of member in respect of
which the casual vacancy has arisen, if the
remaining term of office of the board is less
than half of its original term:
Provided also that, if the Board fails to fill up
such casual vacancy within three months of
the date of occurrence, the Registrar shall fill
up through nomination.=
3. The crucial expression in both the first and the
second proviso to Section 29E is <original term=. In the
first
proviso
to
Section
29E,
the
Co-
operative Election Commission shall hold elections to fill
up a casual vacancy if the remaining term of the Board
is more than half of its original term and the second
proviso contemplates cooption in the case of a casual
vacancy if the remaining term of the office of the Board
is less than half of its original term. If the crucial
expression, for the purposes of computation to decide
whether there must be election or the co-option, is
8original term9, it must necessarily relate to the date of
the constitution of the Board at the first instance. The
6
date on which the post falls vacant would not be the
real test to compute. Therefore, the petitioners cannot
succeed on the grounds urged and the petition must
fail. The petition stands rejected accordingly.
Sd/-
JUDGE
nv
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.