1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.200797/2021
BETWEEN
DR. HUCHESH @ HARSHA
S/O SHIVAPPA KADALIMATTI,
AGE 47 YEARS, OCC: ACCADEMIC
REGISTRAR, HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT,
ANATOMY DEPARTMENT
EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE
CORPORATION, KALABURAGI 585105
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI HULEPPA HEROOR, ADVOCATE)
AND
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS
ADDL. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
KALABURAGI 585107
2.
DR. SUSHMA D/O BASAPPA HYDER
AGE 47 YEARS, OCC: UN-EMPLOYED
R/O H.NO. 10-28, PRASHANT NAGAR,
RAJAPUR ROAD, KALABURAGI 585105
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI GURURAJ V. HASILKAR, HCGP FOR R1;
SMT. NEEVA M. CHIMKOD, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
2
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING
TO ALLOW THE ABOVE PETITION AND QUASH THE FIR
AND COMPLAINT IN CRIME NO.34/2021 REGISTERED BY
THE WOMEN POLICE STATION, KALABURAGI PENDING ON
THE FILE OF THE LEARNED I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (J.D.)
AND JMFC, GULBARGA, FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/SEC.420
AND 504 OF IPC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
Though this petition is listed for admission, with the
consent of learned counsel for the parties, it is taken up for
final disposal.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner,
the learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent
No.1, learned counsel for respondent No.2 and respondent
No.2 - Dr.Sushma, the complainant, who is present before
the Court.
3.
This petition is filed under Section 482 of
Cr.P.C. with the following prayer:
"The petitioner
praying to allow the
above
petition
and
quash
the
FIR
and
3
complaint in Crime No.34/2021 registered by
the Women Police Station, Kalaburagi pending
on the file of the learned I Addl. Civil Judge
(J.D.) and JMFC, Gulbarga, for the offence
p/u/Sec.420 and 504 of IPC."
Brief facts of the case are as under:
The complainant/Dr.Sushma filed a complaint with
Kalaburagi City Women police station against the petitioner
herein for the offences punishable under Section 420 and
504 of IPC, which was registered in Crime No.34/2021 on
07.02.2021. In the complaint, it is contended that the
petitioner herein was also a doctor and he has put up a
profile. Based on the said profile, the complainant was
interested to marry the petitioner herein after he obtains
divorce decree in respect of his first marriage. It is further
alleged that before conclusion of divorce proceedings, the
petitioner herein insisted for physical relationship with the
complainant, which was opposed by the complainant.
There were repeated requests on behalf of the petitioner
herein. However, the complainant did not agree for the
4
same. Subsequent thereto, the complainant came to know
that the petitioner herein had married another woman. It
is further contended that before petitioner herein married
second time, the complainant was made to believe that the
petitioner was interested in her and thereby emotionally
complainant got attached to the petitioner and after his
marriage for the second time, she felt that she has been
cheated by the petitioner and longer conversation with the
petitioner had made her to believe that he would be
marrying her after he obtains necessary divorce decree in
respect of his first marriage. It is also contended that
when he was actually participating in the marriage
reception of the second marriage, he had falsely
represented to the complainant that he is out of station.
Being
disgusted
attitude
and
conduct
of
the
accused/petitioner, the complainant lodged a complaint
with Kalaburagi City Women police station in Crime
No.34/2021 for the offences punishable under Sections
420 and 504 of IPC against the petitioner.
5
4.
The petitioner has challenged the registration
of the case by the police on the following grounds:
That the petitioner is an innocent of the offences
alleged against him and he has been falsely
implicated in the above case at the instance of his
well-wishers through the complainant.
That nowhere in the FIR and the complaint
averred any allegation against the petitioner that
he has cheated the complainant and even if it is
attempted to be said so if a person may be
deceived quite innocently, but such deception can
never amount to cheating.
That in order to constitute offence under section
420 of IPC, there must be some inducement by
the accused/petitioner to the complainant at the
initial stage.
That for the convenience of this Hon'ble Court
Section 420 IPC is reproduced as under:
S.420.
Cheating
and
dishonestly
inducing
delivery of property:-
Whoever
cheats
and
thereby
dishonestly
induces the person deceived to deliver any property
to any person, or to make, alter or destroy the whole
or any part of valuable security, or anything which is
6
signed or sealed, and which is capable of being
converted into a valuable security, shall be punished
with imprisonment of either description for a term
which may extend to seven years, and shall also be
liable to fine.
S.504.Intentional insult with intent to provoke
breach of the peace:
Whoever intentionally insults, and thereby g
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.