SRI. RAMA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
SRI. R. MUKUNDA REDDY – Respondent
The present respondents as plaintiffs have initiated a
suit against the present petitioners arraigning them as
3
defendants 1 and 2 and also arraigning two more
defendants, for the relief of permanent injunction with
respect to the suit schedule property on 11.02.1999 in the
court of the learned VII Additional City Civil Judge, (CCH
No.19) at Bangalore (hereinafter for brevity referred to as
<the Trial Court=) in O.S.No.1175/1999.
2. The present petitioners as defendants 1 and 2
appeared in the said suit and filed their written statement,
issues were framed by the trial court in the said suit and the
matter was posted for plaintiffs9 evidence. However, due to
the reason of non-prosecution said suit came to be
dismissed for default on 24.09.2004. The plaintiffs by filing
miscellaneous petition No.762/2004 and the order passed in
the said miscellaneous petition dated 09.07.2010 got the
original suit restored on the file. Thereafter, plaintiffs filed
I.A.No.2 under Order VI Rule 17 read with Section 151 of
Civil Procedure Code on 09.03.2011. However, by
withdrawing the said I.A.No.2 on 04.03.2016 they filed
another similar I.A.No.6 under Order VI Rule 17 of
4
Civil Pro
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.