IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON9BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
AND
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V. HOSMANI
W.A.No.850/2021 (SCST)
BETWEEN :
1.
SHIVARAJU
S/O LATE CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
2.
RAMACHANDRA
S/O LATE CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
3.
LAKSHMIDEVI
S/O LATE CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
RESPS 1 TO 3 ARE R/AT No.278
A.K. COLONY, THANISANDRA
DR.SHIVARAMAKARANTHA POST
KRISHNARAJAPURA POST AND HOBLI
BANGALORE EAST TALUK- 560054.
4.
B.AKKAYAMMA
W/O ANJINAPPA
AGED ABOVE 60 YEARS
R/AT SANJAYANAGAR
SHED ROAD, K.R.PURAM
BANGALORE - 560036
5.
MUNIRATNAMMA.C
D/O LATE CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
- 2 -
R/AT No.278, A.K.COLONY,
THANISANDRA,
DR.SHIVARAMAKARANTHA POST
KRISHNARAJAPURA POST AND HOBLI
BANGALORE EAST TALK 560077.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI JAYKUMAR S. PATIL, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI SOMARAJU.A., ADV.)
AND :
1.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
BANGALORE DISTRICT
BANGALORE-560001.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
BANGALORE NORTH SUB-DIVISION
BANGALORE-560001.
3.
LAKSHMAMMA
D/O LATE DODDAMUNIYAPPA
C/O MUNI CHINNAPPA
4.
MUNIYAMMA
D/O LATE DODDAMUNIYAPPA
C/O MUNIYAPPA
RESPONDENTS 3 AND 4 ARE R/AT
DEVAGANAHALLI, KUNDANA HOBLI
DEVANAHALLI TALUK-560036
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT.
5.
MAMATHA
D/O PARVATHAMMA ANNEYAPPA
6.
RAGHU
S/O LATE PRVATHAMMA ANEEYAPPA
RESPONDENTS 7 AND 8 ARE R/AT
CHIMANAHALLI VILLAGE
CHENNARAYAPATNA HOBLI
DEVANAHALLI TALUK,
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-560034.
7.
QUEENY STEPHEN
W/O LATE STEPHEN
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
- 3 -
8.
WILLIAM STEPHEN
S/O LATE STEPHEN
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
R/AT NO.49, HUCHINS ROAD
BANGALORE-560084.
&RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI SHASHI KUMAR.G.V., AGA FOR R-1 & R-2;
SRI L.P.G. REGO & ARJUN REGO ADVS. FOR R-7 & R-8.)
THIS W.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
FINAL ORDER DATED 22/07/2021 PASSED BY LEARNED
SINGLE
JUDGE
IN
W.P.NO.48351-52/2017
AND
CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION FILED BY THE
RESPONDENT NO.1 AND 2 HEREIN AND PASS ANY OTHER
ORDER OR DIRECTION ON THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES
OF THE ABOVE APPEAL.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING,
THIS DAY, S. SUJATHA, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
This Intra Court appeal is directed against the
order dated 22.07.2021 passed in W.P.No.48351/2017
whereby the writ petition filed by the respondent Nos.7
and 8 herein has been allowed quashing the impugned
order dated 20.09.2017 [Annexure-A] passed by the
respondent No.1 3 Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru
wherein
the
order
passed
by
the
Assistant
Commissioner, Bengaluru 3 respondent No.2 herein
[Annexure-B] are quashed.
- 4 -
The appellants contend that the lands in
Sy.No.94 for the extent of 2 acres 37 guntas of
Thanisandra village, Krishnarajapuram Hobli, formerly
in Bangalore South Taluk 3 now in Bangalore East
Taluk was originally granted in favour of Laguma @
Dekka on 20.01.1937 under the Darkasth Rules. The
husband of the respondent No.3 herein had purchased
the said property from the legal heirs of the said grantee
on 16.12.1994 through the registered sale deeds vide
common document Nos.8758/1994-95 and 8763/
1994-95.
The appellants herein claiming to be the
legal heirs of the original grantee Laguma @ Dekka had
filed O.S.No.1311/1999 for partition and separate
possession of the said granted lands before the I
Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge [CCH-2]
against the family members and the respondent Nos.7
and 8 herein. The said suit came to be dismissed on
- 5 -
17.04.2012. Thereafter the appellants had filed the
application
before
the
Assistant
Commissioner,
Bengalore North Sub-division under the Karnataka
Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes [Prohibition of
Transfer of Certain Lands] Act, 1978 ['PTCL Act9 for
short] whereby an order was passed by the Assistant
Commissioner restoring the lands in favour of the
grantee [LRs of the grantee].
Being aggrieved, the respondent Nos.7 and 8
herein had filed an appeal before the first respondent 3
Deputy Commissioner and the same came to be
dismissed by upholding the orders of the Assistant
Commissioner. Aggrieved by the said orders, the
respondent
Nos.7
and
8
herein
had
filed
W.P.Nos.48351-52/2017 which has been allowed by the
Writ Court. Hence, this writ appeal by appellants.
Learned Senior Counsel Sri.Jaykumar S.
Patil representing the appellants submitted that the
- 6 -
learned Single Judge has allowed the Writ Petition
mainly on the ground that the application filed by the
appellants after lapse of 21 years was not maintainable,
hence the orders passed by the respondent Nos.1 and 2
herein are liable to be set aside. Placing reliance on the
Co-ordinate bench decisions of this Court in the case of
Smt.P.Kamala V/s. The State of Karnataka, Rep. By
Its Secretary, Revenue Department and Others [ILR
2019 KAR 3301] and in the case of Smt.Kavita V/s.
The
Deputy
Commissioner
and
Others
[W.A.No.100893/2015, D.D. 02.07.2020], the learned
Senior Counsel submitted that the order of the Writ
Court is against the principles of audi alteram partem
since no opportunity was given to the appellants to
explain the reasons for delay. It was submitted that
O.S.No.1311/1999 was filed by the appellants against
the family members of the original grantee and the
appellants herein, which came to be dismissed for want
of Court fee. These appellants were not the signatories
- 7 -
to the sale deeds executed. The said sale deeds not
being binding on these appellants, the learned Single
Judge ought to have addressed the issues on merits
instead of allowing the writ petition merely on the
ground of delay and laches said to have been caused by
the appellants in approaching the authorities under the
PTCL Act.
Learned counsel for the respondent Nos.7
and 8 submitted that O.S.No.1311/1999 was a collusive
suit filed by the appellants to knock off the property
sold by the legal heirs of the original grantee through
registered sale deeds. The said suit was dismissed after
adjudicating upon the issues framed considering the
merits of the case, not merely on the aspect of Court fee,
as contended by the appellants. It was argued that a
specific stand was taken by the respondent Nos.7
and 8/petitioners befor
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.