IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 102855 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
SHRI. SURESH S/O. JAVANRAM CHOUDARI
AGE. 32 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS,
R/O. KHARA, TQ. AHORUA, DIST. JALUR,
STATE. TAMILNADU 3 343041,
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT POONERAJPOORAM,
NEAR H. P PETROL PUMP,
COIMBATORE,
STATE TAMIL NADU 3 641001.
&PETITIONER
(BY SRI. S. M. MUCHHANDI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THE POLICE INSPECTOR RAMADURG,
TQ. RAMADURG, DIST. BELAGAVI 3 591123.
REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
AT: DHARWAD BENCH 580011.
2.
SHRI. HANSRAJ S/O. BAILRAJ CHOUDARI
AGE. 50 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS,
(FATHER OF COMPLAINANT/VICTIM)
R/O. BITTUDA HALL, NAVIPETA, RAMADURG,
TQ. RAMADURG, DIST. BELAGAVI-591123.
&RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PRASHANTH V. MOGALI, HCGP FOR R1;
R2 - SERVED)
- 2 -
CRL.P No. 102855 of 2022
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 439 OF CR.P.C.,
SEEKING
TO
THE
PETITION
BE
ALLOWED
AND
THE
PETITIONER/ACCUSED MAY BE ENLARGED ON REGULAR BAIL IN
RAMADURG P.S. CRIME NO.115/2022 U/S 363, 376(2) (N), 506 OF
IPC AND SECTION 4 AND 6 OF POCSO ACT, PENDING IN SPL.CASE
NO.201/2022, ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND
SESSIONS JUDGE, FTSC-1, BELAGAVI.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
This petition is filed by the sole accused under
Section 439 of The Code of Criminal Procedure,
1973 (hereinafter referred to as the 8Cr.P.C.9, for
brevity) seeking bail in Crime No.115/2022 of
Ramadurg
Police
Station
registered
for
the
offences
punishable
under
Sections
363,
376(2)(n),
506
of
The
Indian
Penal
Code
(hereinafter referred to as the 8IPC9, for brevity)
and Sections 4 and 6 of Protection of Children
from
Sexual
Offence
Act,
2012
(hereinafter
referred to as the 8POCSO Act9 for brevity).
- 3 -
The case of the prosecution is that one
Hansraj Choudari has filed the complaint stating
that he is residing in Ramadurg along with his wife
and children, having a sweet mart and his minor
daughter victim girl is aged 17 years 9 months
studying in IInd year PUC. On 27.06.2022 the
victim girl has left the house at 7.40 a.m., went to
the college and she did not return till 5.15 p.m.
The complainant called the victim9s mobile and it
was switched off. He enquired with the college
and was informed that the victim has not come to
the college. They made search but she was not
traced. The said complaint came to be registered
in Crime No.115/2022 of Ramadurg Police Station
for the offence punishable under Section 363 of
IPC against unknown person.
The theory put forth by the prosecution is that
the victim girl and the petitioner were traced on
30.06.2022 and the statement of victim girl has
- 4 -
been recorded. The victim girl stated that she
came to know the petitioner through F Snap chat
and as he belonged to their community she
accepted the friend request. They started talking
to each other and started loving each other. The
petitioner
asked
the
victim
girl
to
come
to
Tirumala Hotel at Ramadurg on 27.06.2022 and
both of them traveled by flight from Belagavi to
Bengaluru and later went to Coimbatore and
stayed
in
Murugan
Lodge,
wherein
the
petitioner/accused has committed forcible sexual
intercourse on her by threatening her. While they
were traveling in the train her relative met her in
Sholapur and he in turn informed the victim9s
parents.
The petitioner/accused came to be
arrested on 01.07.2022 and he is in judicial
custody.
The
Police
after
completing
the
investigation
filed
charge
sheet
against
this
petitioner/accused
for
the
offences
punishable
- 5 -
under Sections 363, 376(2)(n), 506 of IPC and
Sections 4 and 6 of POCSO Act. The petitioner has
filed Criminal Miscellaneous No.1203/2022 seeking
bail and the same came to be rejected by the
Additional District and Sessions Judge FTSC-I,
Belagavi by order dated 19.09.2022. Therefore,
the petitioner/accused is before this Court seeking
bail.
3.
Heard the arguments of learned counsel
appearing for petitioner and learned High Court
Government Pleader for respondent No.1-State.
Inspite
of
service
of
notice
respondent
No.2/complainant
remained
absent
and
unrepresented.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would
contend that on perusal of the statement of victim
girl it is clear that she is in love affair with this
petitioner. The victim is aged 17 years 9 months
- 6 -
as on the date of alleged offence. The victim is of
the age of understanding the consequences of her
acts. The doctor who examined the victim girl has
opined that her dental age is 18 to 19 years and
skeletal age is more than 20 years. It is his
further submission that as per call detail records it
is the victim girl had made phone calls on the date
of alleged kidnap. The petitioner is not married
and he is carrying business at Coimbatore. The
petitioner is ready to abide by any terms and
conditions imposed by this Court. As the charge
sheet is filed, the petitioner is not required for
custodial interrogation. With this, he prayed for
allowing the petition.
5.
Per
contra,
learned
High
Court
Government Pleader would contend that, the date
of birth of the victim girl is 07.09.2004 as per her
birth certificate and SSLC marks card. The
- 7 -
statement of the victim girl has been recorded
under Sect
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.