2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 59510
- 1 -
WP No. 50331 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MAY, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.VEERAPPA
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K. S. HEMALEKHA
WRIT PETITION NO. 50331 OF 2019 (S-CAT)
BETWEEN:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REP BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVT.,
DEPT. OF PERSONNEL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU-560001.
2.
THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A & E),
KARNATAKA,
BENGALURU-560001.
&PETITIONERS
(BY SRI KIRAN KUMAR, HCGP)
AND:
1.
M. S. RAVISHANKAR, IAS (RETD).,
S/O LATE M. SIDDAMALLAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
RETD. SECRETARY TO GOVT.,
MINORITY WELFARE DEPT.,
VIKASA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU-560001.
2.
UNION OF INDIA.,
BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVT.,
MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL AND PUBLIC
GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS,
Digitally signed by
USHA NAGENAHALLI
SHANMUKHAPPA
Location: High Court
of Karnataka
- 2 -
WP No. 50331 of 2019
DEPT. OF PERSONNEL AND TRAINING,
NORTH BLOCK,
NEW DELHI-110001.
&RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI A.S. PONNANNA, SENIOR COUNSEL A/W
SRI NAVEED AHMED, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI ATHMA V. HIREMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
****
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO
QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 23.08.2018 PASSED IN
O.A.NO.502/2017
ON
THE
FILE
OF
THE
CENTRAL
ADMINISTRATIVE
TRIBUNAL
AT
BENGALURU,
VIDE
ANNEXURE- C.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, B.VEERAPPA J., MADE
THE FOLLOWING:-
The State has filed the present writ petition challenging
the
order
dated
23/08/2018,
passed
in
O.A.No.170/00502/2017,
on
the
file
of
the
Central
Administrative Tribunal (<the CAT= for short), allowing the
original application directing the present petitioners to release
the entire DCRG, commuted value of pension and all other
pensionary benefits to the applicant within one month from the
date of receipt of a copy of the order.
- 3 -
It is the case of the State Government/ petitioners
that respondent No.1/M.S.Ravishankar, IAS, a retired officer,
while working as a Managing Director in M/s. My Sugar
Company Limited (an organization under the Government of
Karnataka) (hereinafter referred to as <the Company= for the
sake of convenience) from 16/07/2001 to 19/09/2002 allegedly
caused a loss of Rs.62,42,000/- to the company in a deal of
supply of sugar to the Food Corporation of Nepal in collusion
with M/s.Indo Foreign Agencies Pvt. Ltd., Bombay, contrary to
the resolution of the Board of Directors of the Company.
3.
It is the further case of the petitioners/State
Government that respondent No.1 had authorized a sub-agent
namely M/s. Om Impex Limited at Nepal to receive, sign the
tender document, submit the tender and sign the contract on
behalf of the company9s agent M/s. Indo-Foreign Agencies Pvt.
Ltd., Bombay and allowed to do all acts regarding export of
sugar without entering into any proper legal/commercial
agreement with the said sub-agent while not being empowered
to do so. He failed to take reasonable precautions to safeguard
the interest of the Company and as a consequence of
cancellation of contract, the Company suffered a loss of
- 4 -
Rs.62,42,000/- which is directly attributable to the failure of
respondent
No.1
to
guide
the
business
transaction
appropriately which amounted to gross negligence and
dereliction of duty. Thereby, the departmental proceedings
were initiated against respondent No.1 and a show-cause notice
dated 24/07/2008 was issued under Rule 8 of All India Services
(Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969 on the charge of alleged
misconduct while working as Managing Director of the
Company.
4.
Respondent No.1 failed the reply to the show-cause
notice and was again given extension of time for providing
reply several times and ultimately, the State Government, by
letter dated 23/03/2009, informed respondent No.1 that on
failure to comply with the notice issued, the Government will
have to presume that he has no explanation and the
Government has to proceed to pass ex parte order in
accordance with law. Since there was no reply from
respondent No.1, the State Government, exercising powers
conferred under Rule 8(2) of All India Services (D & A) Rules
appointed an enquiry officer and a presenting officer vide
- 5 -
Government Order bearing No.DPAR 203 SAS 2008 dated
07/07/2009.
5.
Being aggrieved by the action of the State
Government,
respondent
No.1
filed
an
application
in
O.A.No.363/2009 before the CAT, Bengaluru. After hearing
the parties, the CAT vide order dated 11/02/2013 allowed the
application and quashed the impugned order therein directing
the respondents that the inquiry may now commence de novo
from the point on which day it issued the show-cause notice
and all the documents sought by the applicant to be served on
him within two weeks from the date of the order and issued
five directions.
6.
The order passed by the CAT has reached finality.
It is further stated that on 20.03.2013 second show-cause
notice was issued and reminders were issued on 15.04.2013,
22.01.2014 and 04.03.2014. Finally, respondent No.1 filed his
reply on 20.03.2014 and sought to drop the proceedings.
Thereafter, the petitioner came to be retired from service on
31.03.2015 after attaining the age of superannuation and the
provisional
pension
was
sanctioned,
but
not
paid
the
- 6 -
pensionary
benefits.
Therefore,
respondent
No.1/M.S.Ravishankar
was
constrained
to
file
O.A.No.170/502/2017 before the CAT contending tha