2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 56319
RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
MR PRADEEP S M – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.P/10210/2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
CRIMINAL PETITION No.10210/2022
BETWEEN:
MR. PRADEEP S.M,
S/O MALLU
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
C/O KAMALAMMA HOUSE
3RD CROSS, SINGAIANAPALYA
MAHADEVPURA
BENGALURU
PERMANENT R/O SANABADAKOPPALA VILLAGE
CHIKKULI HOBLI
PANDAVAPURA TALUK
MANDYA DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. HARISH V.S, ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH STATION HOUSE OFFICER
RAMAMURTHY NAGAR POLICE STATION
BENGALURU
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. K. NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION
439 OF CR.P.C, PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON
BAIL IN CR.NO.333/2022 OF RAMAMURTHY NAGAR P.S.,
BENGALURU CITY FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 20(B) AND
22(C) OF N.D.P.S. ACT PENDING BEFORE X ADDL.C.M.M.
COURT, MAYO HALL, BENGALURU CITY.
THIS PETITION HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED
FOR
ORDERS
ON
30.11.2022,
COMING
ON
FOR
2
‘PRONOUNCEMENT OF ORDER’ THIS DAY, THE COURT
MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The petitioner/accused No.1 has filed this
petition under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for enlarging him
on bail in Crime No.333/2022 Ramamurthy Nagar
Police Station, Bengaluru City, registered for the
offences punishable under Sections for the offence
punishable under Section 22(C) and 20-B of Narcotic
Drug and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (‘NDPS
Act’ for short) pending on the file of 10th Additional
CMM Court, Mayo Hall, Bengaluru City.
2.
The brief factual matrix leading to the case
are that, on 02.09.2022 at 8.00 p.m., when the
complainant-PSI
was
discharging
his
duty
in
Ramamurthy
Nagar
Police
Station,
he
received
credible
information
that
in
Kasturinagara
at
Krishnarajapura Railway Station, near the Compound
wall two persons were selling contraband to the public
in order to have unlawful gain. He has immediately
3
informed the matter to DCP of East Division and ACP of
Banasawadi Sub-division and obtained their permission
to conduct raid. He has also secured panchas to the
station, and along with staff and panchas and other
required materials including tools, went to the spot at
8.40 p.m.. and started surveying the area. Then he
found that two persons were carrying bags came there
and were trying to sell the contraband articles to the
public. Then they surrounded them and apprehended
them. The petitioner is one of them and he is arraigned
as Accused No.1 and he was found in possession of 12
grams MDMA, while Accused No.2 was found in
possession of ½ Kg. of Ganja. When the Investigating
Officer interrogated them, they disclosed that, they
have secured the said articles from a different person
at KGF Railway Station and selling the same in order
to have unlawful gain. Then the complainant sent a
requisition to ACP, since search was required to be
conducted in presence of the Gazetted Officer and ACP
came to the spot in the night at 22.15 hours and he
4
informed the petitioners that, he is the Gazetted
Officer and they are at liberty to get them personally
checked either in presence of Gazetted Officer or
nearest Magistrate, and the petitioner disclosed that he
has no objection for getting searched in presence of
ACP and on searching, the petitioner was found in
possession of 12 grams of MDMA substance while,
Accused No.2 was found in possession of half (½) Kg.
of Ganja and cash and the same were seized and
mahazar was drawn. The petitioner was arrested and
produced before the learned Magistrate and he was
remanded to judicial custody. The petitioner has
approached the learned Special Judge with a bail
petition and learned Special Judge has rejected the bail
petition and hence, he is before this Court.
3.
Heard
the
learned
counsel
for
the
petitioner/Accused and the learned HCGP for the
Respondent-State. Perused the records.
4.
Learned counsel for t