1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF AUGUST 2022
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.102210/2022
BETWEEN:
YAMANAPPA S/O. NEELANAGOUDA GOUDAR,
AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O. KUNIBENCHI, TQ: HUNGUND,
DIST: BAGALKOTE 3 587118.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VIDYASHANKAR G.DALWAI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS P.S.I., AMENGAD POLICE STATION,
HUNGUNDA CIRCLE,
REPRESENTED BY
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
DHARWAD-011.
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. PRASHANTH V.MOGALI, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439
OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO ALLOW THE PETITION AND ENLARGE
THE PETITIONER ON REGULAR BAIL IN CRIME NO.0043/2022
OF
AMENGAD
P.
S.,
HUNGUNDA
CIRCLE
FOR
OFFENCES
PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 376 AND 448 OF IPC, WHICH
PENDING ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL SR. CIVIL JUDGE
(SR.DN.) & CJM COURT, HUNGUNDA WITH SUCH CONDITIONS
WHICH THIS HON9BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO BE IMPOSED IN
THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE.
2
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
This petition is filed by the sole accused under
Section 439 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
(hereinafter referred to as the 8Cr.P.C.9, for brevity)
seeking bail in Crime No.43/2022 of Amengad Police
Station, registered for the offences punishable under
Sections
376
and
448
of
The
Indian
Penal
Code
(hereinafter referred to as the 8IPC9, for brevity).
2.
The
case
of
the
prosecution
is
that,
one
Smt.Tippawwa W/o. Siddappa Shadlageri R/o. Kunibenchi
Village in Hungund Taluk has filed a complaint stating
that, 25 years back she married one Siddappa Shadlageri
and got three children and her sister was deaf and dumb
by birth and hence she also married her husband and got
2 children. All family members know the action by hand of
her sister and complainant9s son Krishna is living with her
sister and
two sons at Kunibenchi Village and the
3
complainant her husband and 2 children had been to
Udupi for coolie work. On 08.04.2022 her son Krishna
called her and informed that, on 07.04.2022 at 11:00
a.m. when the victim who is deaf and dumb was grooming
the house, at that time the petitioner/accused noticing her
alone in the house entered the house and closed the door
and had forcible sexual intercourse on her. It is on
09.04.2022 the complainant came back to Kunibenchi
Village from Udupi and at that time, on enquiry, the
victim lady in her own style of sign language narrated the
incident committed by the petitioner/accused. At that time
accused was going out from her house, Dyavangouda
Bheemappa Hanamakatti saw him and she informed him
regarding the incident and then he informed to Krishna
son of the complainant. The complainant has taken her
sister to the petitioner/accused and she identified him by
hand signal. The complainant after discussing with the
family members filed a complaint on 09.04.2022 which
came to be registered in Crime No.43/2022 of Amengad
Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections
4
376 and 448 of IPC. The petitioner came to be arrested on
the same day and he is in judicial custody. Thereafter, the
Police after investigation filed the charge sheet against
the petitioner for the aforesaid offences. The petitioner
filed Criminal Miscellaneous No.397/2022 seeking bail and
the same came to be rejected by the learned Principal
District and Sessions Judge, Bagalkote by order dated
20.07.2022. Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court
seeking bail.
3.
Heard the arguments of the learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner and the learned High Court
Government Pleader for the respondent-State.
4.
The learned counsel for the petitioner would
contend that, the alleged incident had occurred on
07.04.2022 at about 11:00 a.m. and the complaint came
to be filed on 09.04.2022 and there is a delay in filing the
complaint.
The
petitioner
is
a
neighbour
of
the
complainant and he is aged 62 years. As the charge sheet
5
is filed the petitioner is not required for any custodial
interrogation. With this, he prayed to allow the petition.
5.
Per contra, learned High Court Government
Pleader would contend that, the offences alleged against
the
petitioner
are
heinous
offences
punishable
with
imprisonment for life. The petitioner alleged to have
committed forcible sexual intercourse on the victim who is
deaf and dumb by entering her house when she was alone.
The Doctor who examined the victim has noted injuries on
her body and has also collected the articles which were
sent for examination to FSL. The Doctor who examined the
accused has opined that there is nothing to suggest that
the person is incapable of performing sexual intercourse.
The charge sheet shows prima facie case against the
petitioner for the offences alleged against him. One
Dyavanagouda Hanamakatti who is cited as CW7 in the
charge sheet is a person who saw the accused coming out
of the house of the victim on the date of the incident and
on enquiring the victim she narrated the incident to him in
6
her sign language who in turn intimated the same to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.