JUDGMENT

2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.

4. After hearing both the parties, the trial court framed the following issues for consideration:-

(ii) Whether the plaintiffs further prove that the tenancy of the defendant is validly terminated as per Section 105 and 106 of Transfer of Property Act?

(iv) Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the relief of ejectment of the defendant as prayed for?

5. The plaintiff No.2 examined himself as PW-1 and Exs.P1 to P5 were marked on their behalf. PW-1 was partly cross-examined by the defendant and having not been cross- examined further, the trial court proceeded to hear the arguments of both sides and decreed the suit in favour of the plaintiffs against the defendant. Aggrieved by the impugned judgment and decree passed by the trial court, appellant -defendant is before this Court by way of the present appeal.

" (i) Whether the trial court was justified in coming to the conclusio