- 1 -
CRL.A No. 2838 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF MAY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2838 OF 2012 (C-)
BETWEEN:
H. NAGARAJ S/O HANUMANTHAPPA,
AGE: 20 YEARS, OCC: LICENSED SURVEYOR,
OFFICE OF ASSISTANT DIRECTOR,
SURVEY DEPARTMENT, BELLARY.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI S.H.MITTHALKOD, ADV.)
AND :
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
RPTD BY POLICE INSPECTOR,
KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA, BELLARY,
THROUGH SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
CIRCUIT BENCH, DHARWAD.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI SANTOSH B.MALAGOUDAR, ADV.)
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED U/S 374(2) OF CR.P.C.
SEEKING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND ORDER OF
CONVICTION AND SENTENCE DATED 28.08.2012 PASSED IN
SPL.CASE NO.41/2009 BY THE SPL. JUDGE, BELLARY.
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING
THIS DAY, COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
MANJANNA
E
Digitally
signed by
MANJANNA
E
- 2 -
CRL.A No. 2838 of 2012
Heard the learned counsel Sri S.H.Mittalkhod and
learned counsel Sri Santosh B.Malagoudar appearing for
the parties.
2.
This appeal is filed by the accused who has
been convicted by the learned Special Judge in Spl.Case
No.41/2009 on the file of Principal Sessions Judge and
Special Judge, Bellary by judgment dated 28.08.2012 and
sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of
two years and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- for the offence
punishable under Section 7 of the P.C. Act, 1988
(“P.C.Act” for short) and sentenced to undergo simple
imprisonment for a period of 3 years and to pay fine of
Rs.10,000/- for the offence punishable under Section
13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of P.C.Act.
3.
Brief facts of the case are as under:
The prosecution alleges that on 25.11.2008 at about
10.30
a.m.,
the
complainant
by
name
Sri
- 3 -
P.S.Ghanamallanagouda gave a written complaint to the
Karnataka Lokayukta Police, Bellary stating that he has
filed an application in the office of the Surveyor, Bellary
seeking for measurement of his land bearing Sy.No.33 D/1
measuring 1 acre 01 gunta and to prepare a sketch. On
24.11.2008 he visited the Taluk Office and met the
accused who was working as a surveyor and requested
him to hand over the survey sketch. At that juncture, the
accused demanded illegal gratification in a sum of
Rs.2,000/- for the purpose of discharging his official duty
i.e., for issuance of the survey sketch. The complainant
requested the accused to reduce the bribe amount, but
accused
insisted
for
payment
of
Rs.2,000/-.
The
complainant was not willing to pay the said illegal
gratification, therefore, approached the Lokayukta Police.
4.
The Lokayukta Police after verifying the veracity
of the allegations made by the complainant, secured two
panch witnesses for the purposes of intended raid/trap.
Thereafter, the contents of the complaint were explained
- 4 -
to the panch witnesses and trap team was formed by the
investigating agency. After demonstrating the reaction of
phenolphthalein
powder
with
the
sodium
carbonate
solution, the investigating officer, drafted experimental
mahazar. Four currency notes of Rs.500/- denomination
were secured from the custody of the complainant and
phenolphthalein powder was smeared on the said currency
notes and instruction was given to the complainant to
keep the currency notes with him and hand over the same
when the accused demands the illegal gratification. The
shadow
witness
was
directed
to
accompany
the
complainant and carefully watch the activities that would
take place while the complainant is handing over the
tainted money to the hands of the accused. These aspects
were also incorporated in the entrustment mahazar.
5.
After so instructing, the trap team comprising of
pancha witnesses, complainant and other sub staff of the
Investigating Officer proceeded to the office of the
accused. As per the instruction, the complainant and
- 5 -
shadow witness went inside the office of the accused. Co-
panch and other members of the trap party were waiting
for the designated signal. When the complainant entered
the office of the accused and demanded for issuance of
survey sketch on demand by accused, the complainant
handed over the tainted currency notes to the hands of
the accused which was taken by the accused and kept in
his shirt pocket.
6.
After so handing over the tainted money, the
complainant gave the pre-designated signal to the raid
party.
7.
Immediately the raid party came to the office of
the accused and enquired the accused about the receipt of
the tainted money. Accused initially pleaded ignorance and
later on he took out the tainted money from the shirt
pocket, which was seized by the head of the raid party in
the presence of panch witnesses. Subsequently colour test
was conducted and the colour test stood positive.
Immediately
accused
was
also
arrested
and
his
- 6 -
explanation was taken; the relevant documents were
seized. All these aspects were reduced into trap mahazar.
Later, acc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.