2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 42993
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 22nd DAY OF AUGUST 2022
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.102161/2022
BETWEEN:
ABDUL SALEEM
S/O. ABDUL JABBAR KOTEBAGILU
AGE. 49 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE WORK,
R/O. NEAR IDGA, JANATA COLONY,
CHANDAVAR VILLAGE, TQ. HONNAVAR,
DIST. U.K. KARWAR-581323,
(NOW IN JUDICIAL CUSTODY)
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. R.H. ANGADI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
(HONNAVAR POLICE STATION,
UK, KARWAR)
R/BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH DHARWAD-580011
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. PRASHANTH V. MOGALI, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 439 OF CR.P.C.,
SEEKING TO ENLARGE THE PRESENT PETITIONER/ACCUSED ON
BAIL IN SC NO.22/2021, PENDING ON THE FILE OF II
ADDITIONAL
DISTRICT
AND
SESSIONS
JUDGE,
UTTAR
KANNADA, KARWAR, IN CONNECTION WITH HONNAVAR P.S.
CRIME NO.136/2021, FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S
2
354(A),
354(D),
302,
509,
504,
506,
201
OF
IPC.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
This petition is filed by the sole accused under
Section 439 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
(hereinafter referred to as the 8Cr.P.C.9, for brevity)
seeking
bail
in
Honnavar
Police
Station
Crime
No.136/2021 registered for the offences punishable under
Sections 354A, 354D, 302, 509, 504, 506 and 201 of the
Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as the 8IPC9, for
brevity).
2.
The
case
of
the
prosecution
is
that,
one
Smt.Jabeena, wife of Abutalib Shaikh has filed complaint
stating that the petitioner/accused was misbehaving with
the ladies in the area and he was removing his dress and
was using indecent words to the womenfolk and he was
advised by the people in the area and even her husband
had advised not to behave like that. It is further stated
3
that the accused misbehaved with a lady by name Heena
Kauser by removing his lungi and acted indecently. It is
further stated that, on 03.05.2021 at about 11:00am, the
accused misbehaved with the wife of one Sri.Azaruddin
Alisab
Shaikh
and
acted
indecently,
for
which,
her
husband and Azaruddin called the accused and advised
him not to do so. After moving some distance, they went
in front of the house of the accused person and enquired
him why he has misbehaving with the womenfolk, for
which, the accused started abusing the husband of the
complainant and questioned him as to who he is and
thereafter her husband advising him not to trouble the
womenfolk, at that point of time, he removed a knife,
which was kept in his waist, and assaulted her husband on
his left side of the chest. Her husband fell down and blood
started oozing out. Smt.Heena Kauser, her son Abdul
Rahuf started shouting, at that time, neighbours have
assembled there and gave treatment to him. The accused
ran away from the place of occurrence with the knife. The
husband
of
the
complainant
was
shifted
to
Kumta
4
Government Hospital wherein he was declared dead. The
said complaint came to be registered in Honnavar Police
Station Crime No.136/2021 for the aforesaid offences.
The petitioner came to be arrested on 03.05.2021 and he
is in judicial custody. The police, after investigation filed
charge sheet. The petitioner filed bail application in SC
No.22/2021 and the same came to be rejected by the
learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Uttara
Kannada, Karwar, by order dated 24.12.2021. Therefore,
the petitioner is before this Court seeking bail.
3.
Heard the arguments of the learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner and the learned High Court
Government Pleader for the respondent-State.
4.
It would be the contention of the learned
counsel for the petitioner that, there is discrepancy in the
averments of the complaint and also in the further
statement of the complainant. On looking to the statement
of CW.1-Jabeenabi, it cannot be said that there was any
intention or preparation but the alleged act has taken
5
place in grave and a sudden provocation. It is his further
submission that, as per the postmortem report, there is
only one injury. The petitioner might have caused the said
injury to safeguard himself. As charge sheet is filed, the
petitioner is not required for any custodial interrogation.
With this, he prayed to allow the petition.
5.
Per contra, learned High Court Government
Pleader
would
contend
that
the
petitioner
was
misbehaving with the ladies in the area. The husband of
the complainant went to advise him and at that time, the
petitioner brought the knife and assaulted with it on the
chest of the deceased-Abutalib Shaikh and caused his
death.
The
Doctor,
who
conducted
postmortem
examination over the dead body of the deceased has
noted a injury and has given final opinion that the said
injury caused his death. There are several eyewitnesses
cited in the charge-sheet, who have specifically stated the
alleged overt act of the petitioner/accused. Charge-sheet
material show prima facie case against the petitioner for
6
the offences alleged against him. If the petitioner is