2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 61920
- 1 -
CRL.A No. 100491 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 100491 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
1.
PRAVEEN S/O MALLIKARJUN MOKASHI
AGE.19 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT
2.
SANGAMESH S/O MALLIKARJUN MOKASHI
AGE.19 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT
3.
DINESH S/O ASHOK MOKASHI
AGE.19 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT
4.
SANDEEP S/O MANOHAR YELEMMI
AGE.36 YEARS, OCC: PRIVATE WORK
5.
BHARAT S/O YALLAPPA KATTIMANI
AGE.19 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT
6.
SHRISHAIL S/O YALLAPPA KATTIMANI
AGE.19 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT
ALL ARE R/O KUMBAR MADU, BAGALKOTE
TQ. AND DIST. BAGALKOTE 587101
&PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. NAVEEN CHATRAD, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BAGALKOTE TOWN P.S.
REP.BY ITS ADDL.STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD
- 2 -
CRL.A No. 100491 of 2022
2.
PRAJWAL S/O UMAPATI NEELANAYAK
AGE. MAJOR, OCC. NIL
R/O WARD NO. 4, AMBEDKAR COLONY,
BAGALKOTE, TQ. AND DIST. BAGALKOTE 587101
&RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PRASHANTH V. MOGALI, HCGP FOR R1.
SRI. SHARANABASAVARAJ C., ADV. FOR R2.)
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED U/S 14 A(2) OF SC ST
(POA) ACT, SEEKING TO ALLOW THIS CRIMINAL PETITION BY
SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 21.09.2022 PASSED BY THE
II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOTE, IN
CRIM.MISC.NO.545/2022 AND CONSEQUENTLY RELEASE THE
APPELLANTS/ACCUSED NO1 TO 6 IN THE EVENT OF THEIR
ARREST BY THE BAGALKOTE TOWN P.S. IN CRIME NO.78/2022
FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/S 143, 147, 148, 323, 324,
341, 504, 506, R/W 149 OF IPC AND U/S 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) AND
3(2)(va) OF SC. ST (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
Accused Nos.1 to 6 have filed this appeal
challenging the order dated 21.09.2022 passed in
Criminal Miscellaneous No.545/2022 whereunder the
anticipatory
bail
petition
filed
by
the
appellants/accused Nos.1 to 6 came to be rejected
which was sought with respect to Crime No.78/2022
for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147,
- 3 -
148, 323, 324, 341, 504 and 506 read with Section
149 of The Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred
to as the 8IPC9, for brevity) and under Sections
3(1)(r) & (s) and 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes
and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities)
Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as 8SC & ST Act9,
for brevity).
Heard
the
learned
counsel
for
the
appellants, the learned counsel for respondent No.2
and the learned High Court Government Pleader for
respondent No.1/State.
The case of the prosecution is that, on
31.08.2022 when the first informant was present in
the Tonga stand, Bagalkote, the appellants/accused
Nos.1 to 6 had formed themselves into an unlawful
assembly in view of the enmity and picked up
quarrel with the first informant and others and when
the first informant intervened and advised the
appellants not to pick up quarrel, the appellants left
- 4 -
the spot by threatening the first informant and
others. On the same day, at about 9:30pm when
the first informant was present near Kumbar Madu
cross, all the appellants came to the spot by forming
themselves into an unlawful assembly and restrained
the first informant and others. Appellant No.3
assaulted on the face of the first informant with a
stump and abused him in filthy language touching
his caste by taking his caste and due to the said
assault, the first informant lost part of his tooth.
Appellant No.1 assaulted one Shrishail Chenni with a
stump on his fore head. Appellant No.4 assaulted
one Sagar with club. All the appellants assaulted the
first informant and others with hands and legs and
they altogether abused them touching the caste and
threatened to kill them. The said complaint came to
be registered in Bagalkote town Police Station Crime
No.78/2022
for
the
aforesaid
offences.
The
appellants/accused Nos.1 to 6 apprehending their
arrest
filed
Criminal
Miscellaneous
No.545/2022
- 5 -
seeking anticipatory bail and the same came to be
registered by the learned II Additional District and
Sessions
Judge,
Bagalkote
by
order
dated
21.09.2022. The said order is challenged in the
instant appeal.
Learned counsel for the appellants would
contend that there is no prima facie case made out
against the appellants to attract an offence under
Section 3 of SC & ST Act. It is his further
submission that the alleged incident had occurred at
about 9:30pm and there is no mention of the
presence of other persons on the spot and therefore,
it cannot be said that the offence alleged had taken
place in the place within the public view. It is his
further submission that, the abuse of touching the
caste by the appellants is omnibus allegation and
there is no specific allegation against each of the
accused of they abusing the complainant touching
the caste name. The appellants are all students
- 6 -
except
appellant
No.4.
The
injured
have
not
sustained any severe injuries and they have been
discharged from the hospital. Without taking into
consideration all these aspects, the learned Sessions
Judge has passed the impugned order which requires
interference by this Court. With this, he prayed to
allow the appeal.
Per contra, learned HCGP would contend
that, the investigation is in progress. The appellants
have abused the first informant by touching his
caste and it clearly attracts the offence under
Section 3 of the SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989 and
therefore, there is a prima-facie case against the
appellants and bar under Section 18 is attracted. In
the alleged incident, three persons have sustained
injuries. If the appellants are granted anticipatory
bail, they will hamper the investigation and tamper
the prosecution witnesses. Considering all