SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
MAHESH N.N – Appellant
Versus
SRINIVASMURTHY – Respondent


The petitioner filed a private complaint in CC No.729/2017

against the respondent for the offence punishable under Section

138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. As a counter blast,

respondent filed a private complaint in PCR No.157/2017 against

the petitioner for the offences punishable under Sections 406,

420, 506 of IPC and Sections 5, 38, 39 of Karnataka Money

Lenders Act and Section 4 of the Karnataka Prohibition of

Charging Exorbitant Interest Act, 2004. The jurisdictional

Magistrate referred the complaint filed by the respondent to the

jurisdictional police for investigation under Section 156(3) of

Cr.PC. The police after conducting investigation submitted `B'

report. The jurisdictional Magistrate after considering the

protest petition and also sworn statement of the respondent,

registered the case against the petitioner for the offences

punishable under Sections 406, 420 of IPC. Being aggrieved,

this petition is filed.

3

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

jurisdictional Magistrate has convicted the respondent for the

offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument

Act and the same has attained finality. Hence, the registration

of th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top