MUGA @ KALAIAH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
The petitioners claim that they were allotted sites No.82
measuring 25 x 30 ft and No.221 measuring 20 x 30 ft. situated
3
at Block No.2, Holenarasipura, Hassan District by the
respondents under Ashraya Scheme. Though the hakkupatras
were issued, the 5th respondent has not handed over the vacant
possession of the said sites.
2.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners
submits that the petitioners having been allotted the subject sites
under the Ashraya Scheme, the 5th respondent is under an
obligation to handover the vacant possession of the subject sites
as specified under the Ashraya Scheme.
3.
On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing for
the 5th respondent submits that after conducting an enquiry, the
petitioners were found to be ineligible for allotment sites under
the Ashraya Scheme and as such, the competent Authority has
cancelled the allotment made in favour of the petitioners. The
cancellation of allotment of sites made in favour of the petitioners
was notified by publishing the same in `Janamithra' daily local
newspaper on 7.12.1997. Hence, he submits that the petitioners
are not entitled for possession of the subject sites when the
allotment made in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.