2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 61917
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.9659/2022
BETWEEN:
HALLAGERE SHANKAR
S/O LATE RUDREGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
R/O NO.78, 4TH CROSS
VINAYAKA BADAVANE
ANDRAHALLI MAIN ROAD
NEAR CHETHAN CIRCLE
BENGALURU - 560 091
& PETITIONER
(BY SRI SIRAJIN BASHA, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI BALARAJ K.N, ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BYADARAHALLI POLICE STATION
BENGALURU - 560 091
REPRESENTED BY THE
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDINGS
BENGALURU - 560 001
& RESPONDENT
(BY SRI K.K.KRISHNA KUMAR, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439
OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN
2
S.C.NO.21/2022 (CR.NO.404/2021) OF BYADARAHALLI P.S.,
BENGALURU CITY FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.306 R/W. 34 OF IPC.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
This petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., seeking
regular bail of the petitioner/accused in Crime No.404/2021 of
Byadarahalli Police Station for the offences punishable under
Section 306 read with Section 34 of IPC.
2.
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader
appearing for the respondent/ State.
3.
The factual matrix of the case of the prosecution is
that this petitioner is the father of two daughters and one son,
who have committed the suicide along with their mother i.e.,
wife of this petitioner and also a grand son of this petitioner.
The Police have registered a case, investigated the matter and
filed the charge-sheet and also collected the death note, laptop
and pen-drive, wherein an accusation is made against this
petitioner that this petitioner subjected all the family members
3
for harassment and even instigated his two son-in-laws to
trouble his two daughters and also threatening his two daughters
to go and join with their respective husband or otherwise he was
going to slap them on the street with Chappal and instigated all
of them to commit the suicide.
4.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
would vehemently contend that this petitioner was provided all
comforts to his wife and children and some differences were
there in the house between this petitioner and wife and children.
This petitioner has not committed any offence invoking Section
306 of IPC. No ingredient of an offence under Section 306 of IPC
is collected by the Investigating Officer and he is in custody from
the last 15 months. Whether this petitioner instigated the family
members to take an extreme step of committing the suicide or
not has to be tested in a trial. The learned counsel would submit
that when the investigation has been completed and the charge-
sheet is also filed, no need of custodial trial. Hence, he may be
enlarged on bail.
4
5.
Per contra, the learned High Court Government
Pleader appearing for the State would submit that not only the
wife has committed the suicide and his two daughters and son
and also a grand son, in all five deaths are taken place at the
instigation of this petitioner since this petitioner subjected all the
family members for harassment and instigating them to end
their life, as a result, they took the extreme step of committing
suicide. The learned High Court Government Pleader also would
submit that the death note left by three persons, who are the
family members i.e., two daughters and a son, are also seized,
the same is sent to FSL. The learned High Court Government
Pleader also would submit that laptop and pen-drive were also
seized with regard to the character of this petitioner and the
report is also awaited from FSL. Hence, at this stage, the
petitioner cannot be enlarged on bail.
6.
Having heard the respective counsel and also on
perusal of the material available on record, in the FIR, the
specific allegations are made against this petitioner that the
death is consistent with hanging and the same is committed by
5
the family members i.e., wife, two daughters and a son and also
a grand son in the house of this petitioner. It is also borne out
from the records that this petitioner did not visit the house and
the bodies were recovered after the respective bodies are
decomposed and all the deaths are taken place in the house of
this petitioner. Apart from that, two daughters, who are residing
with this petitioner and they were not residing with their
respective husband. The allegation against this petitioner is that
this petitioner was scolding the two daughters to go and join
with their husband or otherwise he is going to slap them with
chappal in the street that is the accusation made in the charge-
sheet. Apart from that, two daughters and son have left their
death note, the same were seized and sent to the FSL and the
genuineness of the death notes are to be verified and the laptop
and pen-drive are