1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. NATARAJAN
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 8143/2022
BETWEEN:
NARASIMHAPPA
S/O LATE NAGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
R/O KURLAHALLI VILLAGE
NANDI HOBLI
CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK
CHIKKABALLAPUR - 583219
.....PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PAVAN KUMAR G, ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY WOMEN POLICE STATION
CHIKKABALLAPUR
REP BY SPP HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU - 560001
.....RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.B.J.ROHITH, HCGP)
THIS CRL.P FILED U/S.439 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE
FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE COURT
2
MAY BE PLEASED TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN
CR.NO.35/2021 OF WOMEN P.S., CHIKKABALLAPURA FOR
THE OFFENCE P/U/S.376(2)(k),376(2)(m),376(2)(o) OF IPC
AND SEC.5(J)(ii),5(K),5(L),6 OF POCSO ACT PENDING ON
THE FILE FO THE ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE FAST
TRACK SPECIAL COURT I (POCSO) AT CHIKKABALLAPURA
IN SPL.S.C.NO.59/2021.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDER
THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCE, THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING :
Respondent No.2 served and unrepresented.
This petition is filed by the petitioner/accused
under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., for granting bail in Crime
No.35/2021
registered
by
Women
Police,
Chikkaballapura for the offences punishable under
Sections 376(2)(k), 376(2)(m), 376(2)(o) of Indian
Penal Code and under Sections 5(J)(ii), 5(K), 5(L), 6 of
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.
2.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner
and the learned High Court Government Pleader for the
respondent-State.
3
3.
The case of the prosecution is that on a
complaint filed by respondent No.2-Lakshmamma, the
police registered the case on 28.4.2021. Where it is
alleged that her daughter, aged 17 years, was omitting
and she was taken to the hospital for a medical
checkup, there it was found that the victim was
pregnant. On questioning, the victim revealed the
name of the petitioner/accused, who owns a petty shop
and used to take the victim to the land and sexually
assault her, causing her to become pregnant. After
registering the case, the police arrested the petitioner
on 28.04.2021 and he remained in custody. His bail
petition was rejected by this Court on earlier occasion
in Crl.P.7172/2021 dated 23.10.2021 with liberty to
approach this Court after receipt of the DNA report.
Hence, he is before this Court.
4.
Upon hearing the arguments of learned
counsel for the petitioner and the learned HCGP and on
4
perusal of the records, it shows that the petitioner was
arrested and he is in custody from April 2021 more
than one year six months. The investigation has been
completed and charge sheet has been filed. The
allegation against his that he has committed sexual
harassement on victim girl aged about 17 years. Even
164 of Cr.P.C statement of the victim was recorded
where she categorically stated that this petitioner is
running a petty shop and enticed the victim by
providing food and money and took her to the land and
sexually assaulted her and thereafter she came to
know that she is pregnant while examined by the
doctors and lodged the complaint. There is occular
evidence against the petitioner regarding commission
of offence. However, DNA test report reveals that the
petitioner is not cause for the pregnancy and he is not
a biological father of the fetus.
5
Therefore,
considering
the
same
without
expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and
by
imposing
certain
conditions,
if
the
petitioner/accused is granted bail, no prejudice would
be caused to the case of the prosecution. Hence, I pass
the following:
ORDER
The criminal petition is allowed.
The trial Court is directed to release the
petitioner/accused on bail in Crime No.35/2021,
subject to the following conditions:-
i)
Petitioner shall execute personal bond in
a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two
Lakhs only) with two sureties for likesum
to the satisfaction of the trial Court;
ii)
Petitioner shall not tamper with the
prosecution
witnesses
directly
or
indirectly;
6
iii)
Petitioner shall not indulge himself in
similar offences strictly;
iv)
Petitioner shall take the trial without
causing any delay; and
v)
Petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction
of this Court without prior permission.
If any of the conditions are violated, the
prosecution is at liberty to file an application for
cancellation of bail.
Sd/-
JUDGE
hdk
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.