IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.200394/2022
BETWEEN
PADDAPPA S/O DURAGAPPA,
AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: LECTURER,
R/O MALLADAGUDDA VILLAGE,
TQ: MANVI (NOW MASKI TALUK),
DIST: RAICHUR, NOW AT SHORAPUR,
TQ: SHORAPUR, DIST: YADGIR-585202
(SOLE ACCUSED AS PER CHARGE SHEET).
….PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MAHANTESH PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REP. BY SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURGI BENCH -585107
(THROUGH LINGASUGUR POLICE STATION,
DIST: RAICHUR-584101).
.....RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. H.S.SHANKAR, H.C.G.P.)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF CR.P.C.
PRAYING TO GRANT THE REGULAR BAIL TO THE PETITIONER IN
CRIME NO.172/2021 OF LINGASUGUR POLICE STATION, DIST:
RAICHUR FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 342,
376, AND 506 OF IPC IN C.C.NO.10120/2021 PENDING ON THE
FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) AND JMFC COURT,
LINGASUGUR, RAICHUR DISTRICT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE
AND EQUITY.
- 2 -
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THROUGH VIDEO
CONFERENCE AT DHARWAD BENCH, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE
THE FOLLOWING:
Heard Sri. Mahantesh Patil, learned counsel for the
petitioner and Sri. H.S.Shankar, learned High Court
Government Pleader for the respondent-State.
2.
The present petition is filed under Section 439
of Cr.P.C. with the following prayer:
“To
grant
the
regular
bail
to
the
petitioner in Crime No.172/2021 of Lingasugur
Police Station, Dist: Raichur for the offences
punishable under Sections 342, 376 and 506
of IPC in C.C.No.10120/2021 pending on the
file of Principal Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC
Court, Lingasugur, Raichur district, in the
interest of justice and equity.”
3.
Brief facts of the case are as under:
Victim lady aged about 27 years lodged a complaint
with the Lingasugur Police, Raichur district for the
offences punishable under Sections 342, 376, 506 of IPC.
- 3 -
Gist of the complaint averments is that the victim
lady came into acquaintance with the accused when she
had been to write an examination in First Grade College
Surpur, wherein the accused was a room supervisor.
After confirming about the position of the accused in the
college with others, she developed friendship with the
accused. The accused had promised the victim lady to
marry. Subsequent thereto, on 17.07.2021, accused
came in a car and abducted the victim lady and kept her
in a room in Surpur and he committed forcible sexual
intercourse with her on 18.07.2021, 19.07.2021 and
20.07.2021. She was confined in a room and her hands
were tied and victim lady mouth was gagged with a help
of plaster whenever accused used to go-out of the house.
Accused also fed her with food and other requirements
and using one occasion where accused has left mobile
phone unattended, she called her relatives and intimated
the incident. Thereafter, the relatives of the victim lady
- 4 -
came to the place and rescued her and at that juncture
accused told the relatives that he would marry the victim
girl in Amareshwar Temple next day. Believing the words
of accused, accused, victim lady and two relatives of the
victim lady moved on two motorcycles. Enroute to their
respective places, accused requested the rider of the
motorcycle to stop the motorcycle in the guise of
attending nature call and thereafter escaped from the
place. It was near Mouneshwar Temple. Thereafter
complaint came to be lodged by the victim lady on
11.09.2021. The police after registering the case in Crime
No.172/2021 for the aforesaid offences investigated the
matter and filed the charge sheet. The attempt made by
the accused seeking grant of anticipatory bail was turned
down by this Court and thereafter accused surrendered
before the Court and he is custody on and from
17.02.2022. Attempt made by the accused to obtain
- 5 -
order granting regular bail is turned out by the District
Court. Thereafter, petitioner is before this Court.
4.
Learned
counsel
for
the
petitioner
Sri
Mahantesh Patil reiterating the grounds urged in the
petition, contended that to establish the element of rape,
there is no material evidence on record except the
statement of the victim lady which is artificial in nature.
He pointed out that the medical records produced by the
prosecuting agency clearly establish that the hymen is
intact and the opinion of the doctor is that there cannot
be any positive material on record to hold that there are
traces of forcible sexual intercourse. Taking note of these
aspects of the matter, counsel sought for grant of bail.
5.
Per contra, learned High Court Government
Pleader opposes the bail petition on the ground that the
matter of this nature what is to be looked into is whether
the male part accused has been penetrated into the
- 6 -
female part to any extent which would be sufficient
enough construe the offence of rape and mere fact that
hymen being intact or other medical records not
supporting the case of the prosecution would not ipso
facto render the prosecution case is doubtful and thus
sought for rejection of the bail petition.
6.
He also contended that the statement of the
victim lady has been recor
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.