2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 50816
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MAY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
M.F.A.NO.7477/2015 C/W
M.F.A.NO.4244/2017 (MV-I)
IN MFA NO.7477/2015 (MV)
BETWEEN:
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.,
REGIONAL OFFICE,
NO.144, 1ST FLOOR,
SHUBHARAM COMPLEX,
M.G.ROAD, BANGALORE-1.
& APPELLANT
(BY SMT. MANJULA N. TEJASWI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI. SHIVANANDA GOWDA PATIL @
SHIVANANDA S. PATIL @
PATIL SHIVANANDA GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
R/O NO.1508, 2ND CROSS,
6TH MAIN, 5TH STAGE,
1ST PHASE, BEML,
R.R. NAGARA, BENGALURU-98.
2.
SRI. AMAR SIDDAPPA MAGAVI,
S/O SIDDAPPA MAGAVI,
NO.5928, SAPTAGIRI NILAYA,
NEAR KODAVA SAMAJA,
2
VIJAYANAGARA 2ND STAGE,
MYSORE-570001.
(RC OWNER OF MOTOR CYCLE
NO.KA-09-ES 1682)
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI D. NAGARAJA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R1
V/O DTD-26/08/2021 SERVICE OF NOTICE TO R1 IS H/S,
V/O DTD-30/06/2021 NOTICE TO R2 IS D/W)
THIS M.F.A IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV
ACT
AGAINST
THE
AND
AWARD
DATED:24.06.2015 PASSED IN MVC NO.4234/2013 ON
THE FILE OF THE 2ND ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE
AND
28TH
ACMM,
BENGALURU,
AWARDING
COMPENSATION OF RS.14,44,682/- WITH INTEREST AT
RS.6% P.A., FROM THE DATE OF THE PETITION TILL THE
DATE OF DEPOSIT AND ETC.,
IN MFA NO.4244/2017 (MV-I)
SRI. SHIVANANDA GOWDA PATIL,
@ SHIVANANDA S. PATIL,
@ PATIL SHIVANANDA GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
S/O SIDDANA GOWDA PATIL,
R/O NO.1508, 2ND CROSS, 6TH MAIN,
5TH STAGE, 1ST PHASE, BEML,
RR NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 036.
(BY SRI. NAGARAJA REDDY D. ADVOCATE)
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO., LTD.,
NO.144, SHUBHARAM COMPLEX,
MG ROAD, BENGALURU-560 009.
REP. ITS MANAGER
3
MAJOR,
R/O NO.5928, SAPTHAGIRI NILAYA,
VIJAYANAGAR, 2ND STAGE,
MYSORE-571 124.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. MANJULA N. TEJASWI, ADV., FOR R1,
V/O DTD-22/03/2022 NOTICE TO R2 IS D/W)
ACT PRAYING TO ENHANCE THE AWARD AMOUNT WITH
INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 12% P.A., TILL THE
REALIZATION PASSED BY THE HON9BLE II ADDL. SMALL
CAUSES JUDGE AND XXVIII ACMM AT BENGALURU IN
MVC.NO.4234/2012 BY THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD
DATED 24.06.2015 AND ETC.,
THESE M.F.As. COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS
DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
The appeal in MFA No.7477/15 is filed by the
Insurance Company challenging the Judgment and Award
dated 24.06.2015 passed in MVC No.4234/2015 by the II
Addl. Small Causes Judge & XXVIII ACMM, Bengaluru and
P.O., MACT, Bengaluru, challenging the quantum of Award.
The appeal in MFA No.4244/2017 is filed by the
claimant seeking for enhancement of compensation.
4
3.
The brief facts of the case are that on
13.07.2013, at about 4.00 p.m., when the petitioner was
riding motorcycle bearing Registration No. KA-16/J-3064
along
with
a
pillion
rider
on
Nehru
Main
Road,
Rajarajeshwari Nagara, Bengaluru, the rider of motorcycle
bearing Registration No. KA-09/ES-1682 came in a high
speed and dashed against the petitioner9s motorcycle and
due to the impact, the petitioner sustained grievous
injuries and suffered disability. Hence, he preferred the
claim petition in MVC No.4234/2015 against the rider of
the offending motorcycle and the Insurance Company.
The Tribunal has awarded compensation to the claimant
awarding a sum of Rs.14,44,682/- with interest at 6% per
annum from the date of petition till deposit and directing
the Insurance Company to deposit the entire compensation
amount.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the Insurance
Company submitted that there is no evidence produced by
the claimant to show that he had suffered loss of future
earning and the claimant has not produced his bank
5
passbook / statement subsequent to the month of June,
2013. Further, even after the accident, to show that the
claimant is not working in any other company and he has
sustained loss of earning, he has not produced the bank
passbook for the month of July, 2013. The bank passbook
produced by the claimant is only upto 29.06.2013.
Therefore there is no evidence from the claimant9s side to
show that he has suffered loss of future earning. Learned
counsel further submitted that Exhibit P20 is the bank
statement of the Company in which the claimant was
working and it is upto 07.06.2013. It does not reflect the
salary of Rs.60,000/- was given to the claimant. Therefore
it is doubtful that the claimant was receiving salary of
Rs.60,000/- per month before the accident. Under the
circumstances, the salary slip exhibits P17 and P20 cannot
be believed.
5.
Learned counsel submitted that in order to
prove loss of future earning, claimant has not produced
any evidence much less the bank passbook of July, 2013
to show that he had lost the job or he left the job and
6
therefore did not receive any salary. Therefore in the
absence of any evidence, the award of compensation
under the head < Future loss of earning= by the Tribunal is
not correct.
6.
Learned counsel for the Insurance Company
further submitted that the claimant admitted in his
evidence that he has got insurance coverage for medical
ex