SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SRI THIMMANNA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Heard Sri. Rajashekar for Sri. S.C.Manjunath, learned

counsel for the petitioner and Sri. Rahul Rai K, learned HCGP

for the respondent-State and perused the records.

2.

Present petition is filed under Section 439 of

Cr.P.C. with the following prayer:

<Wherefore, the petitioner prays that this

Hon9ble Court be pleased to order to release

the petitioner on bail, in Cr.No.170/2021 of

Aimangala Police Station and C.C.No.15/2022

of learned Addl. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC

Court at Hiriyur and now committed to Prl.

District and Session Judge at Chitradurga

(Session Case number not at assigned) for the

offences punishable under Sections 323, 326,

307, 354, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC

in the interest of justice.=

3

3.

The brief facts of the case are as under:

A complaint came to be lodged by Smt.Latha wife of

Chennakeshava on 11.11.2021 which was registered by the

Aimangala

police

station,

Chitradurga

District

in

Cr.No.170/2021 for the offences punishable under Sections

143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 307, 354, 504, 506 read with

Section 34 of IPC. Thereafter, the matter was thoroughly

investigated, interalia the present petitioner was arrested.

The complaint averments reveal that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top