- 1 -
MFA No. 21040 of 2010
C/W MFA No. 21326 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 02ND DAY OF JUNE, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.KRISHNA BHAT
M.F.A. NO.21040 OF 2010 (WC-)
C/W
M.F.A.NO.21326 OF 2010
IN M.F.A. NO.21040 OF 2010
BETWEEN:
THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER
NWKRTC DIVISIONAL OFFICE SIRSI,
DIST:KARWAR AND THE APPELLANT IS
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER,
CENTRAL OFFICE, HUBLI
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SHIVAKUMAR S BADAWADAGI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT BASAWWA W/O TIPPANNA HUBLI
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
OCC:HOUSEWIFE,
R/O KADASIDDESHWAR ONI,
SAUNDATTI, DIST:BELGAUM
2.
KUMARI. CHANNAMMA D/O TIPPANNA HUBLI
AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS,
R/O. KADASIDDESHWAR ONI,
SAUNDATTI, DIST:BELGAUM
MINOR REPRESENTED BY HER
NATURAL MOTHER RESPONDENT NO.1
3.
IRANNA S/O TIPPANNA HUBLI
AGED ABOUT 9 YEARS,
Digitally signed
by JAGADISH T R
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD
Date: 2022.06.06
11:02:19 +0530
- 2 -
MFA No. 21040 of 2010
C/W MFA No. 21326 of 2010
R/O. KADASIDDESHWAR ONI,
SAUNDATTI. DIST:BELGAUM
MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS
NATURAL MOTHER RESPONDENT NO.1
4.
ASHOK SHETTY S/O ANAND SHETTY,
AGE MAJOR, OCC:OWNER OF BUS
BEARING NO.KA-20/A-3859,
R/O LAXMI NIVAS,
POST:SALIKERI BHAMAVAR,
TQ AND DIST:UDUPI
5.
THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER
UNITED INDIA INSURNCE CO. LTD.,
DIVISIONAL OFFICE, HUBLI,
DIST:DHARWAD
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. NAGARAJ K. APPANNAVAR, ADV., FOR
SRI. LAXMAN T MANTAGANI, ADV., FOR R1;
R2 & R3 ARE MINORS AND REPRESENTED BY R1;
SRI. S. K. KAYAKMATH, ADV., FOR R4;
SRI. N. R. KUPPELUR, ADV., FOR R5)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 30(1) OF W.C. ACT,
1923 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & ORDER DATED 30.11.2009
PASSED IN WCA. F. NO.91/2008 PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER
AND LABOUR OFFICER FOR WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION, SUB-
DIVISION
–II,
HUBLI,
AWARDING
A
COMPENSATION
OF
RS.1,00,000/- WITH INTEREST @ 12% PER ANNUM FROM THE
DATE OF PETITION TILL THE DATE OF REALISATION.
IN M.F.A.NO.21326 OF 2010
BETWEEN:
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD.,
HUBLI D.O,
- 3 -
MFA No. 21040 of 2010
C/W MFA No. 21326 of 2010
THROUGH ITS DIVISIONAL OFFICE,
LEA COMPLEX, DHARWAD,
REPRESENTED BY ITS
DIVISIONAL MANAGER
SRI.S.K.CHOUDHURY
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. N. R. KUPPELUR, ADV.,)
AND:
1.
SMT BASAVVA
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
W/O THIPPANNA HUBLI @ SANNA HUBLI
R/O KADASIDDESHWAR ONI,
SAVADATTI, DIST:BELGAUM
2.
KUM.CHANNAMMA
AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS,
D/O THIPANNA HUBLI @ SANNA HUBLI
MINOR REPRESENTED BY RESPONDENT NO.1
R/O KADASIDDESHWAR ONI,
SAVADATTI, DIST:BELGAUM
3.
MASTER EARANNA,
AGED ABOUT 10 YEARS,
MINOR REPRESENTED BY RESPONDENT NO.1
R/O KADASIDDESHWAR ONI,
SAVADATTI, DIST:BELGAUM
4.
SRI. ASHOKA SETTY,
MAJOR
S/O ANANDA SETTY,
R/AT LAXMI NIVAS SALIKERI,
BRAMHAVAR, UDUPI TQ AND DISTRICT
(OWNER OF BUS NO.KA-20/A-3859)
5.
THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER
NWKRTC, DIVISIONAL OFFICE SIRSI,
- 4 -
MFA No. 21040 of 2010
C/W MFA No. 21326 of 2010
KARWAR DISTRICT.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. NAGARAJ K. APPANNAVAR, ADV., FOR
SRI. LAXMAN T MANTAGANI, ADV., FOR R1;
R2 & R3 ARE MINORS AND REPRESENTED BY R1;
SRI. S. K. KAYAKMATH, ADV., FOR R4;
SRI. SHIVAKUMAR S. BADAWADAGI, ADV., FOR R5)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 30(1) OF THE WORKMEN'S
COMPENSATION ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER
DATED:30-11-2009 PASSED IN WCA/F-91/2008 ON THE FILE OF
THE LABOUR OFFICER AND COMMISSIONER FOR WORKMEN'S
COMPENSATION,
SUB-DIVISION-II,
HUBLI,
AWARDING
COMPENSATION OF RS.3,32,580/-ALONG WITH INTEREST AT THE
RATE OF 12% P.A.FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL DEPOSIT.
THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
These two appeals are at the instance of the
NWKRTC, which is the hirer of the bus in question in which
the deceased was working as a driver and also by the
insurer of the bus calling in question the judgment and
order dated 30.11.2009 passed in WCA/F-91/2008 by the
learned
Labour
Officer
and
the
Commissioner
for
Workmen’s Compensation, Sub-Division II, Hubli (for short
- 5 -
“the
Commissioner”).
By
the
said
award,
learned
Commissioner has awarded a sum of Rs.3,32,580/- with
interest thereon @ 12% per annum w.e.f. 30 days from
the date of the award. Learned Commissioner has further
levied a penalty of Rs.1,00,000/- payable jointly and
severally against the owner of the bus and NWKRTC,
which is the hirer of the bus.
The foundational facts based on which the claim
petition has been filed is not much in dispute except that,
the insurer questions the finding that the accident
resulting in the death of the employee was arising out of
and in the course of employment.
Learned counsel for the appellant-NWKRTC
places
reliance
on
Section
4A
of
the
Employees’
Compensation Act, 1923 (for short “the Act”) and submits
that the appellant being the hirer of the vehicle, is not
liable to pay the penalty and under the provisions of the
Act, the penalty is liable to be paid only by the employer-
- 6 -
owner of the vehicle. It is therefore, contended on behalf
of NWKRTC that said part of the award is liable to be set
aside insofar as the appellant-NWKRTC is concerned and
appeal to the said extent is required to be allowed.
Learned counsel for the insurer advances two
fold contentions. Firstly, it is contended by him that the
death of the deceased-workman did not take place in an
employment related accident arising out of and in the
course of employment and he died due to natural causes
namely heart-attack. His second contention is that in
terms of Section 4A of the Act, the Insurance Company is
not liable to pay the penalty.
Learned counsel appearing for the claimants,
per contra, submits that the learned Commissioner upon
detailed consideration of the evidence has recorded a
finding that the deceased-workman had died due to an
employment related accident arising out of and in the
course of employment and such finding being based on
- 7 -
evidence is not liable to be interfered with. He also
submits that the finding of the learned Commissioner that
NWKRTC as well as the Insurance Company are jointly and
severally liable to pay not only the compensation proper
but also the penalty imposed is not liable to be interfered
with and there is no merit in the appeals and they are
liable to be dismissed.
6.
The
records
clearly
show
that
deceased-
workman was working as a driver in the bus belonging to
the appellant-Ashok Shetty and while he was performing
his duties, he suffered breathlessness and thereafter he
was taken to hospital and he died due to heart-attack on
the same day. This shows that the deceased-workman was
performing his duty as a driver of a heavy vehicle like bus
and
because
of
work
related
stress,
he
suffered
breathlessness to which he succumbed in the hospital and
the doctors have recorded a diagnosis that it was a heart-
attack. In the circumstances, it cannot be said that there
- 8 -
is no causal connection between the nature of work of the
deceased and the heart-attack he had suffered due to
which he died. Learned Commissioner having recorded
such a finding I do not find any good ground to interfere
with the same and accordingly the submissions of the
learned counsel for the Insurance Company in this behalf
is rejected.
7.
The only other contention which survives for
consideration is whether the Insurance Company and
NWKRTC are liable to pay the penalty portion of the award
made by the learned Commissioner for non-payment of
the compensation when it fell due in terms of the Act. For
the said purposes, it is necessary to make reference to
Section 4A of the Act, which reads as follows:
“4A. 1 Compensation to be paid when due an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.