SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
N S SANJAY GOWDA
SRI TAREHALLI HANUMANTHAPPA – Appellant
Versus
SMT SULOCHANAMMA – Respondent


This is a second appeal by the defendants.

The

respondents

though

served

have

remained unrepresented.

The defendants had instituted a suit seeking

for a declaration that they were having a right of

easement of necessity over 'ABCD' cart-track in Re. Sy

Nos.25 and 26 of Rangapura Village to reach their lands

3

bearing Survey Nos.14, 15/P, 12/P and 13/P of

Papadevarahalli Village which belongs to them.

4.

They stated that the defendants were the

owners of the lands in Re. Sy. Nos.25 and 26 of

Ranagapur Village and there existed a road leading from

Jagalur to Kyasanahalli Village running south-north

abutting to the lands of the defendants. It was stated to

the west of the defendants lands, the lands of the

plaintiffs were situated and in order to access their lands,

they had to use the land of the defendants.

5.

They contended that a portion marked at

'ABCD' cart-track was a necessary easementary pathway

which had been in existence from time immemorial and

they were entitled for use of the said cart-track for the

beneficial enjoyment of their lands. They pleaded that

there was no alternative cart-track to their land and the

defendants were causing obstruction to the usage of the

s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top