HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
N S SANJAY GOWDA
SRI TAREHALLI HANUMANTHAPPA – Appellant
Versus
SMT SULOCHANAMMA – Respondent
This is a second appeal by the defendants.
The
respondents
though
served
have
remained unrepresented.
The defendants had instituted a suit seeking
for a declaration that they were having a right of
easement of necessity over 'ABCD' cart-track in Re. Sy
Nos.25 and 26 of Rangapura Village to reach their lands
3
bearing Survey Nos.14, 15/P, 12/P and 13/P of
Papadevarahalli Village which belongs to them.
4.
They stated that the defendants were the
owners of the lands in Re. Sy. Nos.25 and 26 of
Ranagapur Village and there existed a road leading from
Jagalur to Kyasanahalli Village running south-north
abutting to the lands of the defendants. It was stated to
the west of the defendants lands, the lands of the
plaintiffs were situated and in order to access their lands,
they had to use the land of the defendants.
5.
They contended that a portion marked at
'ABCD' cart-track was a necessary easementary pathway
which had been in existence from time immemorial and
they were entitled for use of the said cart-track for the
beneficial enjoyment of their lands. They pleaded that
there was no alternative cart-track to their land and the
defendants were causing obstruction to the usage of the
s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.