HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KIRTISING ANANTASING SHILLEDAR @ KIRTISING – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
Learned High Court Government Pleader is directed to
take notice for first respondent-State.
Heard Sri M.L. Vanti, learned counsel appearing
for the petitioner and Sri Ramesh Chigari, learned High Court
Government Pleader for State.
3.
The present petition is filed under Section
482 of Cr.P.C with the following prayer:
“Wherefore, the petitioner most humbly
prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to
allow
this
petition
and
quash
the
entire
proceedings
in
Spl.C.No.64/2017
(Crime
No.100/2016) on the file of II. Addl. District and
Sessions Judge, Bagalkot for offences punishable
under Section 363, 366A, 376(2)(i), 376(2)(n),
494, 109, 504, 34 of IPC and Section 3(1)(s),
3(2)(va)of SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities)
Act, 1989 and Section 4 and 6 of POCSO Act and
Section 9 of Child Marriage Restraint Act and all
further proceedings pursuant to therein in respect
of the petitioner herein, in the interest of justice.”
- 4 -
4.
Brief facts of the case are as under:
The victim girl lodged a complaint on 02.08.2016 that
she is a minor, belonging to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled
Tribes community and she has been kidnapped and has been
used for forcible sexual intercourse and as such,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.