2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 48439
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G. PANDIT
WRIT PETITION No.8913/2022 [GM-RES]
BETWEEN:
SRI K.PUTTANARASAPPA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
S/O LATE KAMGE GOWDA
R/AT NO.101, 17TH CROSS
NEAR SBI BANK, MRCR LAYOUT
VIJAYANAGAR
BENGALURU-560042.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI.K.S.NARESH SANTHOSH., ADV.)
AND:
1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION
VIKASA SOUDHA
BENGALURU 3 560001
2 . VIJAYANAGAR CLUB
SITE NO 124
1ST MAIN ROAD
4TH CROSS, HAKKA ROAD
2ND STAGE, HAMPINAGAR
BENGALURU - 560104
REP. BY ITS ADMINISTRATOR
3 . THE ADMINISTRATOR AND
DISTRICT REGISTRAR OF
SOCITIES REGISTRATION
VIJAYANAGAR CLUB
SITE No.124, 1ST MAIN ROAD
4TH CROSS, HAKKA ROAD
2
2ND STAGE, HAMPINAGAR
BENGALURU 3 560104
4 . SRI VENAKTESH K V (R-188)
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
S/O V VENKATAIAH
NO 2214, <GOVIND=
4TH A CROSS, HAMPINAGAR
VIJAYANAGR, BENGALURU 3 560104
5 . SRI K DEVADAS (L-55)
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS
S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA
NO 25, 1ST MAIN
8TH CROSS, PRASHANTHNAGAR
VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU 3 560079
6 . SRI M KRISHNAMURTHY
MAJOR, R/AT NO 26, 1ST CROSS
CHOLUR PALYA, MAGADI ROAD
BENGALURU - 560023
&RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT.RASHMI PATEL, HCGP. FOR R-1;
SRI.MUHAMMED SHAMIL, ADV. FOR R-2 & R-3;
SRI.THONTADHARYA.R.K FOR R-4 TO R-6)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE
ORDER DTD.24.3.2022 ISSUED BY THE R-3 A COPY OF WHICH
IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXUER-Q.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE
THE FOLLOWING:-
Petitioner is before this Court under Articles 226
and 227 of Constitution of India praying for a writ of
certiorari to quash the order 24.03.2022 bearing
3
No.VCLUB/DMN/DR-4/2021-22/378 issued by third
respondent-Administrator (Annexure-R2).
2.
Heard the learned counsel Sri.K.S.Naresh
Santhosh for the petitioner, learned High Court
Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1 and learned
counsel Sri.Muhammed Shamil for respondent Nos.2
and 3 and learned counsel Sri.Thontadharya.R.K., for
respondent Nos.4 to 6. Perused writ petition papers.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would
submit that respondent Nos.4 to 6 were suspended by
second respondent Club by order dated 23.03.2021 in
exercise of its powers under bylaw 22-A[19] of the Rules
and Regulations [Bylaws] of the Club. It is the
submission of learned counsel for petitioner that
suspension order as well as proceedings against
respondent Nos.4 to 6 for dismissal or termination of
membership were placed before the General Body and
the same was pending before General Body for further
4
consideration.
In
that
circumstances,
second
respondent has no power to pass Annexure-Q office
order dated 24.03.2022 clarifying that in view of Bylaw
22-A[19], order of suspension has come to an end and
the suspension order gets suspended. It is submitted
that by referring to Rule 22-A[19][c] that when once the
matter is placed before the Annual General Meeting or
Special Meeting and until its decision, such member
shall be continued under suspension.
4.
On the other hand, learned counsel for
respondent Nos.4 to 6 would submit that enquiry is not
complete and the matter was not placed before General
Body. Further, he submits that no material is placed on
record to demonstrate that proceedings for removal or
termination of membership of respondent Nos.4 to 6 is
placed before the Annual General Meeting. Learned
counsel would invite attention of this Court to Rule 19
and submits that Managing Committee is empowered to
5
warn/suspend its member not exceeding one year
depending upon gravity of misconduct. Since one year
period has expired, Administrator has clarified the same
under Annexure-Q dated 24.03.2022. Hence, he prays
for dismissal of writ petition.
5.
Having
heard
the
learned
counsel
for
petitioner and learned counsel for respondent Nos.4 to 6
and on perusal of writ petition papers, I am of the view
that the petitioner would not be entitled for relief as
prayed in the writ petition.
6.
It is not in dispute that respondent Nos.4 to
6 were suspended from the club under Annexure-E
dated 23.03.2021 alleging certain misconduct against
them. The suspension is in exercise of power under Rule
22-A[19] of the Bylaws of the Club. Rule 19 reads as
follows:
<(19). Disciplinary Action
The Managing Committee is empowered
to warn / suspend a Member for a period not
6
exceeding one year depending upon the
gravity of the misconduct and also dismissal.=
7.
A reading of the above Rule makes it clear
that Managing committee is empowered to suspend
member for one year depending on the gravity of the
misconduct. In the instant case, order of suspension
was passed on 23.03.2021 and one year expired on
23.03.2022. In that circumstance, Administrator under
Annexure-Q clarified the position as stated in Rule 19 of
the Bylaws. Further, learned counsel for petitioner
invited attention of this Court to Rule 19[13][c] which
reads as follows:
<(c)
TERMINATION
OR
REMOVAL
FROM THE MEMBERSHIP
All matters pertaining to termination or
dismissal of Members from the Club, shall be
placed before the Annual General Meeting or
the Special General Meeting under RULE
30(1)(f) and until its decision, such Members
shall be continued under suspension. The
7
decision of the General Body is final in all
such matters.
Note: The Managing Committee, with
the approval of the General Body, shall
prescribe
the
procedure
for
conducting
enquiry against the Members of the Club,
with provision/s for appointing an Enquiry
Officer
and
Presenting