IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 102662 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
CHETANKUMAR S/O. HULAGAPPA BAJANTRI
AGE. 24 YEARS, OCC. DRIVER,
R/O. MOTEBENNUR,
BYADAGI TALUK,
HAVERI DISTRICT-581106.
&PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MADHUKESHWAR A. DESHPANDE, ADV.)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH HAVERI WOMAN POLICE STATION,
REPT BY HCGP HIGH COURT,
DHARWAD-580001.
&RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. PRASHANTH V. MOGALI, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 439 OF CR.P.C.,
SEEKING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 ON
BAIL IN CRIME NO.59/2022 PENDING BEFORE THE SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, HAVERI REGISTERED FOR THE
OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/S 376(N), 420, 504 AND 506 R/W
- 2 -
CRL.P No. 102662 of 2022
SECTION 34 OF IPC, BY THE RESPONDENT HAVERI WOMAN
POLICE STATION.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
This petition is field by accused No.1 under
Section 439 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
(hereinafter referred to as the 8Cr.P.C.9, for brevity)
seeking bail in Crime No.59/2022 of Haveri Women
Police Station registered for the offences punishable
under Sections 376(n), 420, 504 and 506 read with
Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter
referred to as 8IPC9, for brevity).
2.
The case of the prosecution is that, the
victim lady has filed the complaint stating that, in
the year 2019, she was working in Netravati Service
Station at Byadagi and at that time, accused No.1
was also working in the same place and they became
friends and accused No.1 developed fascination
- 3 -
towards her and promised her to marry. That on
12.01.2022 her brother and aunt went to the village
and she was alone in the house and accused No.1
taking advantage of the same, entered the house
quietly and asked water to drink and committed
sexual intercourse on her forcibly against her will on
false promise of marriage. It is further stated that,
due to the act of accused No.1, the complainant
became pregnant. The petitioner/accused No.1 has
also received cash of Rs.6,00,000/- and 3 tolas gold
from the complainant. That on 22.07.2022, she
called the petitioner/accused No.1 through phone
and told that she is 5 months pregnant and asked
his parents to come to her house. At that time
petitioner/accused No.1 and accused Nos.2 to 4
asked whether there is any evidence that she has
become
pregnant
through
accused
No.1
and
threatened and abused her in filthy language. The
said complaint came to be registered in Crime
No.59/2022
for
the
aforesaid
offences.
The
- 4 -
petitioner came to be arrested on 12.08.2022 and he
is
in
judicial
custody.
The
petitioner
filed
Crl.Misc.No.638/2022 seeking bail and the same
came to be rejected by the learned I Additional
District and Sessions Judge, Haveri, by order dated
03.09.2022. Therefore, the petitioner is before this
Court seeking bail.
3.
Heard
the
arguments
of
the
learned
counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned
High Court Government Pleader for the respondent-
State.
4.
The learned counsel for the petitioner
would contend that, the alleged offence is taken
place on 12.01.2022 and the complaint came to be
filed on 12.08.2022 and therefore there is a delay in
filing the complaint and it is not explained. It is his
further submission that the victim lady is aged 24
years and looking to the averments of the complaint
it can be inferred that the alleged physical contact
- 5 -
between the petitioner/accused No.1 and the victim
lady is consensual. It is his further submission that
there is a divorce of the complainant9s marriage with
her husband by mutual consent in M.C. No.99/2022
by judgment dated 05.07.2022. It is his further
submission
that
the
offence
punishable
under
Section 376 of IPC is not attracted. The other
offences punishable under Section 504 and 506 are
alleged against accused Nos.2 to 4. It is his further
submission that the petitioner is in judicial custody
since 12.08.2022 therefore he is not required for
any custodial interrogation. With this, he prayed to
allow the petition.
5.
Per contra, learned High Court Government
Pleader would contend that, investigation is still in
progress. As per the medical examination the victim
lady is pregnant of six months. The statement of
the victim lady has been recorded under Section 164
of
Cr.P.C.,
wherein,
she
has
stated
that
the
petitioner/accused
No.1
under
the
pretext
of
- 6 -
marriage had forcibly committed sexual intercourse
more than 20 times and due to that she become
pregnant. It is his further submission that as the
investigation is in progress and the alleged offence
is heinous, the petitioner is not entitled for grant of
bail. With this, he prayed to reject the petition.
6.
Having regard to the submission made by
the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned High Court Government Pleader, this Court
has gone thro
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.