KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
V N LAKSHMI NARAYANA – Appellant
Versus
STATE BY PUTTUR TOWN POLICE – Respondent
Heard the learned counsel, Sri.C.N.Raju, for the petitioner
and the learned HCGP, Sri.K.S.Abhijith, for the respondent.
2. Petitioners are before this Court calling in question
the order dated 06.08.2022 insofar as it pertains to cancellation
of bail. The order passed by the concerned Court impugned in
this subject petition reads as follows:
<Accused 2 to 13 present.
Case called out again.
Accused absent.
Counsel for Accused filed application
under Sec.70(2) of Cr.P.C. for recall of
NBW. In the absence of Accused the
application for recall of NBW cannot be
considered. Hence application is rejected.
The
Accused
are
granted
bail
on
11.03.2020 on the condition of executing
personal bond for Rs.5,00,000/- each
with two sureties for like-sum. The
Accused have not furnished sureties since
then. Therefore there is no justifiable
grounds for adjourning the case for
furnishing surety. Hence bail granted to
the Accused 2 to 13 has been cancelled.
Issue NBW to Accused r/by 09.09.2022.=
- 5 -
3. A perusal of the order would indicate that the
impugned order is passed only on the ground that personal
bond for Rs.5,00,000/- each with two sureties for the likesum
had not been furnished bef
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.