SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
V N LAKSHMI NARAYANA – Appellant
Versus
STATE BY PUTTUR TOWN POLICE – Respondent


Heard the learned counsel, Sri.C.N.Raju, for the petitioner

and the learned HCGP, Sri.K.S.Abhijith, for the respondent.

2. Petitioners are before this Court calling in question

the order dated 06.08.2022 insofar as it pertains to cancellation

of bail. The order passed by the concerned Court impugned in

this subject petition reads as follows:

<Accused 2 to 13 present.

Case called out again.

Accused absent.

Counsel for Accused filed application

under Sec.70(2) of Cr.P.C. for recall of

NBW. In the absence of Accused the

application for recall of NBW cannot be

considered. Hence application is rejected.

The

Accused

are

granted

bail

on

11.03.2020 on the condition of executing

personal bond for Rs.5,00,000/- each

with two sureties for like-sum. The

Accused have not furnished sureties since

then. Therefore there is no justifiable

grounds for adjourning the case for

furnishing surety. Hence bail granted to

the Accused 2 to 13 has been cancelled.

Issue NBW to Accused r/by 09.09.2022.=

- 5 -

3. A perusal of the order would indicate that the

impugned order is passed only on the ground that personal

bond for Rs.5,00,000/- each with two sureties for the likesum

had not been furnished bef

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top