RSA 236/2012
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY
R.S.A.No.236/2012
BETWEEN:
1.
Smt. Maramma,
Since deceased by her LRs,
1(a)
Gurubasavegowda
S/o late Smt. Maramma,
Aged about 52 years,
1(b)
Doddabasavegowda
S/o late Smt. Maramma,
Aged about 48 years,
1(c)
Mahadevamma
D/o late Smt. Maramma,
Aged about 55 years,
1(a) to 1(c) are R/at Tagadooru village,
Biligere Hobli, Nanjangud Taluk,
Mysore District.
2.
Smt. Mahadevamma,
Since deceased by her LRs,
2(a)
Rachegowda
S/o Late Basavegowda,
Aged about 75 years,
R/at Hadinarugrama,
Chikkayana Choultry Hobli,
Nanjangud Taluk.
2(b)
Rajamma
D/o Late Mahadevamma,
Aged about 45 years,
RSA 236/2012
2
R/at Bhogapura,
Chamarajanagar Taluk & District.
2(c)
Jayamma
D/o Late Mahadevamma,
Aged about 40 years,
R/at Doddakaanyagrama,
Varuna hobli,
Mysore district.
2(d)
Rajegowda
S/o Late Mahadevamma,
Aged about 35 years,
2(e)
Ravi
S/o Late Mahadevamma,
Aged about 30 years,
2(d) & 2(e) are R/at Hadinaru grama,
Chikkayanachoultry Hobli,
Nanjangud Taluk.
3.
Smt. Sannamma
D/o Late Madegowda,
Aged about 47 years,
R/at Kadavekatti Hundi grama,
Siddaramayana hundi post,
Varuna hobli,
Mysore Taluk.
& APPELLANTS
(By Smt. Vanitha.K.R., Adv.)
AND:
Sri Mallegowda
S/o Late Madegowda,
Aged about 62 years,
R/at Hadinaru grama,
Chikkayanachoultry Hobli,
Nanjangud Taluk.
& RESPONDENT
(By Sri T.N.Raghupathy, Adv.)
RSA 236/2012
3
This Regular Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of
CPC against the judgment and decree dated 17.12.2011 passed
in RA.No.377/2011 on the file of the IV Addl. District Judge,
Mysore, allowing the appeal and setting aside the judgment and
decree dated 16.06.2011 passed in OS.No.17/2009 on the file
of the Senior Civil Judge, Nanjangud.
This appeal having been heard and reserved for judgment
on 01.12.2021, coming on for 8pronouncement of judgment', this
day, the court delivered the following:
The plaintiff and defendants 2 & 3 have filed this
regular second appeal challenging the judgment and
decree dated 17.12.2011 passed by the IV Addl. District
Judge,
Mysuru,
in
R.A.No.377/2011
reversing
the
judgment and decree dated 16.06.2011 passed by the Civil
Judge (Sr.Dn.), Nanjangud, in O.S.No.17/2009.
For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred
to by the rank assigned to them in the court at first
instance.
Brief facts of the case that would be relevant for the
purpose of disposal of this appeal are, the plaintiff had
filed O.S.No.17/2009 before the Trial Court seeking
partition and separate possession of the suit schedule
4
properties and she claimed 1/4th share in the suit
schedule properties. It is the case of the plaintiff that
plaintiff
and
defendants
are
the
children
of
one
Madegowda and their mother was Madamma. Madegowda
and Madamma had another son by name Moogegowda
who had expired unmarried prior to the filing of the suit.
The suit schedule properties are their ancestral joint
family properties and after the death of Madegowda and
his wife Madamma, the khatha in respect of the suit
schedule properties were got transferred in the name of
defendant
no.1.
However,
the
plaintiff
and
other
defendants continued to be in joint possession of the suit
schedule properties along with defendant no.1. No
partition was effected in the family after the death of
Madegowda, and therefore, the plaintiff had requested the
defendants to effect partition on 12.12.2008 and since the
defendants kept on postponing the same, the plaintiff was
constrained to file O.S.No.17/2009 seeking 1/4th share in
the ancestral joint family properties left behind by their
father.
5
4.
Defendants 2 & 3 who are the sisters of the plaintiff
had filed written statement admitting the case of the
plaintiff and they had claimed their share in the suit
schedule properties and they also admitted that the suit
schedule properties were the joint family properties.
5.
Defendant no.1 who is the brother of the plaintiff and
defendants 2 & 3 had filed written statement contending
that the plaintiff and the other defendants are not entitled
for a share in the suit schedule properties. It is his case
that the plaintiff and defendants 2 & 3 were married
daughters of late Madegowda and they are residing
separately with their respective husband. It was further
contended by defendant no.1 that at the time of marriage
of the plaintiff and defendants 2 & 3, huge amount was
spent for the purpose of marriage and also for giving gold
and other articles to them at the time of marriage. He had
further contended that he had improved the suit schedule
properties by investing huge amount and the suit schedule
properties have been partitioned between himself and his
6
children, and therefore, there is no scope for further
partition.
6.
On the basis of the rival pleadings, the Trial Court
had framed the following issues:
Issues
ªÁ¢ zÁªÁ D¹ÛUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÁ¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥ÀæwªÁ¢AiÀÄgÀ
MlÄÖ PÀÄlÄA§zÀ dAn ¦vÁæfðvÀ ¸ÀévÀÄÛUÀ¼ÀÄ EgÀÄvÀÛªÉ
JAzÀÄ gÀÄdĪÁvÀÄ¥Àr¸ÀĪÀ¼ÉÃ?
ºÁVzÀÝ°è ªÁ¢ zÁªÁ D¹ÛUÀ¼À°è 1/4 »¸Áì
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥ÀævÀåPÀë ¸Áé¢üãÀ ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄ®Ä CºÀð¼ÁVgÀÄvÉÛãÉAzÀÄ
gÀÄdĪÁvÀÄ¥Àr¸ÀĪÀ¼ÉÃ?
3.
¥ÀæwªÁ¢ 1, zÁªÁ D¹ÛUÀ¼ÀÄ F »AzÉAiÉÄÃ
«¨sÁUÀªÁVzÀÄÝ CªÀgÀªÀgÀ D¹ÛAiÀİè CªÀgÉà SÁvÉ
ºÉÆA¢
¸Áé¢üãÀ
ºÉÆA¢gÀÄvÁÛgÉ
JAzÀÄ
gÀÄdĪÁvÀÄ¥Àr¸ÀĪÀ£ÉÃ?
4.
ªÁ¢ vÀ£Àß ªÁzÀ ¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è «£ÀAw¹zÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ
¥ÀjºÁgÀ
ºÉÆAzÀ®Ä
CºÀð¼ÁVgÀÄvÉÛãÉAzÀÄ
gÀÄdĪÁvÀÄ¥Àr¸ÀĪÀ¼ÉÃ?
7
5.
AiÀiÁªÀ DzÉñÀ CxÀªÁ rQæ?
7.
During the course of trial, the plaintiff in support of
her case, got examined her son who was also her general
power of attorney holder as PW-1 and two other witnesses
were examined as PWs-2 & 3. In support of the plaintiff's
case, 12 documents were produced and marked as Exs.P-1
to P-12. On behalf of the defendants, five witnesses were
examined as DWs-1 to 5 and 11 documents were produced
and marked as Exs.D-1 to D-11. After completion of
recording the evidence, the Trial Court heard the
arguments of the contesting parties and b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.