SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 224

PRATHAP KUMAR G – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


ORDER

1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

“Wherefore, the above named petitioner most respectfully prays this Hon’ble court be pleased to quash the proceedings in Crime No.21/2018 of respondent Vijayanagar Police registered on the basis of offences punishable under section 134(A & B) and 187 of Motor Vehicles Act and Section 279, 428 and 429 of IPC, which is pending on the file of Hon’ble Metropolitan Magistrate Traffic Court-II, at Bengaluru in c.c.no.5016/2018, in the ends of justice”.

2. On 24.02.2018, when the complainant’s mother had taken her pets for a walk as per her routine, a Fortuner SUV vehicle hit one of the pet dogs. The complainant’s brother-in-law and sister took the pet dog - Memphi to a Veterinary Clinic. But the pet dog was declared dead. The incident having occurred between 8.15 to 9.00 p.m. on 24th February 2018, the complainant upon hearing the same from his mother, had called the police helpline who sent two policemen to the spot who verified what had happened and thereafter the complainant registered a complaint with the Vijayanagara Police Station in Crime No.21/2018 against the driver of the Fortuner car bearing Registrat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top