2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 33040
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA
J M RICHARD @ JOY MACDONALD RICHARD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.P/1173/2022
- 1 -
CRL.P No. 1173 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1173 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
1.
J.M.RICHARD @ JOY MACDONALD RICHARD
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
S/O LATE R.P.JOSEPH
R/AT NO.139, CHBS LAYOUT
19TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN
VIJAYANAGAR
BENGALURU – 560 040.
2.
REV.SANJAY SAMUEL
@ SANJAY SAMUEL AYER
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
S/O JOHN S. AYER
R/O ST. ANDREWS CHURCH
NO.27, CUBBON ROAD
BENGALURU – 560 001.
3.
EBENEZER SOUNDAR
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
S/O LATE D. DAVID
R/AT QUARTERS, BISHOP COTTON BOYS SCHOOL
ST. MARKS ROAD
BENGALURU – 560 001.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. VIJAYKUMAR PRAKASH, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by
PADMAVATHI B K
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
- 2 -
CRL.P No. 1173 of 2022
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY CUBBON PARK POLICE
REP. BY ITS INSPECTOR
NOW REP. BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU – 560 001.
2.
MARY SUSHEELA
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
NO.108, 2ND ‘D’ CROSS
OMBR LAYOUT
BENGALURU – 560 043.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI K.S.ABHIJITH, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482
OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER
DATED 01.01.2022, AT ANNEXURE-A PASSED BY THE 50TH
ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, (SPL.COURT FOR
POCSO) AT BENGALURU IN SPL.C.C.NO.188/2017, WHEREBY
THE HONBLE COURT WAS PLEASED TO DISMISS THE
APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER, UNDER SEC.207
CR.PC AND DIRECT THE FIRST RESPONDENT TO SERVE A COPY
OF THE PEN DRIVE AND 2 DVDs SEIZED BY THEM DURING
INVESTIGATION.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
- 3 -
CRL.P No. 1173 of 2022
ORDER
The petitioners in the subject petition call in question
order dated 01-01-2022, passed by the L Additional City Civil
and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru in Special C.C.No.188 of 2017,
rejecting the application filed by the petitioners under Section
207 of the Cr.P.C., in which the petitioners had sought copies of
Pendrive and 2 Digital Videos seized by the Police during
investigation.
2. Heard Sri Vijayakumar Prakash, learned counsel for the
petitioners
and
Sri
K.S.Abhijith,
learned
High
Court
Government Pleader for respondent No.1.
3. Sans details, the facts, in brief, are as follows:-
It is the case of the prosecution that on 08-01-2015 at
the Bishop Cotton Girls School, a ceremony of the new Principal
taking charge was organized. At around 9.00 a.m., when the
members of the Administration or the Governing Body arrived
at the School premises, the gate of the School was locked and
the students belonging to 8th, 9th and 11th standard were
- 4 -
CRL.P No. 1173 of 2022
standing at the gate shouting slogans against the appointment
of the new Principal. It is alleged that the petitioners requested
the students to return to their classes but they refused to heed
to their request and then, the petitioners allegedly abused
them in filthy language and touched them inappropriately. This
becomes a complaint against the petitioners on 10-01-2015
and a crime in Crime No.20 of 2015 came to be registered for
the offences punishable under Sections 354, 355, 504, 506 r/w.
34 of the IPC and Sections 8, 9(f) and 10 of the Protection of
Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short ‘the POCSO
Act’).
4. In the said proceedings i.e., Special C.C.No.188 of
2017, the petitioners file an application under Section 207 of
the Cr.P.C. seeking a copy of Pendrive and 2 DVDs’ that were
seized at the time of investigation. This is turned down by the
learned Sessions Judge by his order d