2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 32120
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.3348 OF 2022
BETWEEN
1. SRI. SHAHUL RAFEEQ M.E,
S/O M.S. IBRAHIM,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS.
2. SRI. EBRAHIM M.SA,
S/O. SAHIRI,
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS.
3. SMT. FATHIMA,
W/O. EBRAHIM M.S.
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
PETITIONER NOS.1 TO 3 ARE RESIDING
BEHIND GANESH FLOOR MILL,
GANAPATHI STREET,
MADIKERI- 571 201,
KODAGU DISTRICT.
4. MR. MOHAMMED ALI
S/O. LATE M.K. ABBAS,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
RESIDING AT UPSTAIRS OF
HERO SHOW ROOM, HILL ROAD
MADIKERI 571201.
... PETITIONERS
[BY SRI. ABDUL SALAM N.K, ADVOCATE]
2
AND
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY K.R. PURAM POLICE STATION
K.R.PURAM SUB-DIVISION,
BANGALORE CITY,
REP.BY THE LEARNED
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU 560 001.
2, SMT. AYESHA BANU KHATEEB @ KHATIB
D/O. SRI. A.M. KHATEEB
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,
R/AT No.1965-37/38,
VINAYAKA EXTENSION, 3RD CROSS,
VIDAYANAGAR,
DAVANGERE 577 005.
&RESPONDENTS
[BY SRI. K.S. ABHIJITH, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI.MOHAMMED ASHRAF , ADV., FOR R2]
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION
482
OF
CR.P.C.,
PRAYING
TO
QUASH
THE
FIR
REGISTERED IN CR.NO.129/2015 ON THE FILE OF K.R.
PURAM POLICE STATION, K.R. PURAM SUB-DIVISION AND
THE CHARGESHEET FILED IN CC No.55344/2018 ON THE
FILE OF THE LEARNED X ADDL.CHIEF METROPOLITAN
MAGISTRATE AT MAYO HALL, BANGALORE CITY, FOR THE
OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 498(A), 323
R/W 34 IPC AND 3 AND 4 OF D.P.ACT.
THIS
CRIMINAL
PETITION
COMING
ON
FOR
ADMISSION
THIS
DAY,
THE
COURT
MADE
THE
FOLLOWING:
3
The petitioners are before this Court calling in
question the proceedings in CC No.55344/2018
registered against the petitioner for the offences
punishable under Sections 498A, 323 R/w 34 IPC and
under Sections 3 and 4 of D.P.Act.
2. The parties were before the Civil Court in OS
No.1/2021, wherein the petitioners have settled the
dispute amongst themselves and have drawn-up such
terms of Settlement. The said Settlement reads as
follows:
"COMPROMISE MEMO U/SEC-89 OF
CPC,
R/W
RULE-24
&
25
OF
THE
KARNATAKA MEDIATION RULES, 2005 FILED
ON
BEHALF
OF
THE
PLAINTIFF
DEFENDANT
That the plaintiff i.e. Smt. Ayesh Khatib
and the defendant have compromised the above
matter on the following terms:
1. The plaintiff is the legally wedded wife
of the defendant and their marriage was
performed on 26.09.2011 as per the customs
prevailing in Muslim community at Hotel Pooja
4
International, P.B. Road, Davangere. Out of the
said wedlock, no issues are born.
2. The plaintiff has lodged a case before
the K.R.Puram Police Station, Benglauru in
Cr.No-153/2018/C.C-55344/2018
for
the
offences punishable U/Sec-498A, 506, R/w-34
of IPC and Sec-3 and 4 of the Prevention of
Dowry
Prohibition
Act,
1961
against
the
defendant and others. Now, the plaintiff and
defendant have compromised this case before
elders for Rs.5,00,000/- (Five Lakhs Rupees
only) as permanent alimony to plaintiff. Now, in
view of the settlement arrive between the
plaintiff and defendant, she has agreed to
withdraw
the
C.C-55344/2018
which
is
pending before the Learned X -Additional Chief
Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru by receiving
a part amount of Rs.1,00,000/- vide DD No-
789206, dated 06/01/2022, account payee D.D,
Kotak Bank, Mercara in favour of plaintiff.
3. That the petitioner has agreed to
withdraw the Crl.Mis.No-201/2019, 311/2020,
243/2021 DV Act recovery cases on the final
orders passed in Crl.Mis No-13/2017 before the
JMFC-III, Davangere. The petitioner also agreed
to withdraw the recovery maintenance case
before the Hon'ble Family Court, Davangere
u/sec-125(3) of Cr.P.C. in Crl.Mis.No-89/2020
& Crl.Mis.No-244/2021 on the final orders
passed in Crl.Mis.No-354/2019 on the file of
Hon'ble Family Court, Davangere.
4. The defendant has agreed to withdraw
the Suit of restitution filed by him before
Learned P.C.J. & JMFC, Madikeri in OS-
108/2017. The defendant has also agreed to
withdraw the said restitution of conjugal rights
case. The defendant also agreed to withdraw the
5
Crl.Appeal No-51/2021 on the file of Hon'ble
ADJ-II, Davangere.
5. It is further agreed between both the
parties
that,
the
defendant
has
to
pay
Rs.4,00,000/- [Four Lakhs Rupees] to plaintiff
towards permanent alimony before the Hon'ble
Family Court, Davangere vide 1]. DD.No.789208
for
Rs.50,000/-,
2].
DD
No.789209
for
Rs.1,00,000/-, 3] DD No.78905 for Rs.50,000/-,
4]. DD No-789207 for Rs.2,00,000/- dated
06/01/2022 account payee Kotak Mahindra
Bank, Mercara respectively in favour of plaintiff.
There are no any articles or things or ornaments
remained between the parties to exchange. As
per the mediation report, the defendant has also
agreed to give consent for divorce to plaintiff.
And the plaintiff has also agreed for the same.
6. That the plaintiff has agreed that she
will not claim any share in the property of the
defendant properties or maintenance or alimony
in future against the defendant. There is no
force or fraud or coercion or undue influence in
entering
this
compromise
memo
by
the
respective parties."
3. The learned counsel appearing for the
respondent No.2 would submit that all the conditions
stipulated in the Settlement have been fulfilled.
4. Therefore, in the light of the Settlement arrived
at between the parties and the offence being under
6
Section 498A IPC and not being against the State, I
deem it appropriate to accept the Settlement and to
terminate the proceedings against the petitioners.
5. For the aforesaid reasons, the following:
ORDER
(i) The criminal petit