SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
V SRISHANANDA
BASAVALINGAPPA S/O GOLLALLAPPA HADAGAL – Appellant
Versus
MADIVALAPPA BHIMARAYA PATIL (HADAGAL) – Respondent


Heard Sri Shivanand V.Pattanshetti and Sri Avinash

A.Uplaonkar learned counsel for the parties.

2.

The present appeal is filed by the complainant

in C.C.No.1505/2011 who obtained an order of conviction

of the respondent herein for the offence punishable under

Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act (for short,

'N.I.Act') and was entitled to a sum of `1,05,000/- as

compensation which was reversed and accused came to be

acquitted of in Crl.A.No.24/2013.

3.

Brief facts of the case are as under :-

A complaint under Section 200 of Cr.P.C came to be

filed by the appellant herein contending that accused has

committed an offence punishable under Section 138 of

N.I.Act and as the cheque issued by him towards his

obligation in repaying the consideration amount of

`2,20,000/-, two cheques came to be dishonored and

3

another cheque in a sum of `1,00,000/- came to be

dishonored for stop payment and he sought for action

against the accused.

4.

The complaint averments further reveal that

the notice issued by him regarding the dishonor of cheques

has been improperly replied and there was no compliance

to the callings of notice, he was constrained to file a

complaint before the learned Magistrate

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top