1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JULY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5735/2022
BETWEEN
SRI BASAPPA
S/O CHIKKABHAIRAIAH
AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS
R/O MADIVALA VILLAGE
UYYAMBALLI HOBLI
KANAKAPURA TALUK
RAMANGARA DISTRICT-562 119
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI SHIVASWAMY, ADVOCATE)
AND
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY RANGE FOREST OFFICER
DODDALAHALLI BRANCH
WILD LIFE RANGE SANGAMA-562 119
KANAKAPURA TALUK
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT
REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU 560 001
& RESPONDENT
(BY SRI H.S. SHANKAR, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438
OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN
THE EVENT OF HIS ARREST IN RESPECT OF WLOR NO.03/2022-
2
23
REGISTERED
BY
THE
RANGE
FOREST
OFFICER,
DODDALANAHALLI
BRANCH,
KANAKAPURA
TALUK,
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE
UNDER SECTIONS 9, 27, 29, 39, 44 READ WITH SECTION 50
AND 51 OF THE WILD LIFE (PROTECTION) ACT AND ETC.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
This petition is filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. praying
this Court to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his
arrest in respect of WLOR No.03/2022-23 registered by the
Range Forest Officer, Doddalanahalli Branch, Kanakapura Taluk,
Ramanagara District for the offences punishable under Sections
9, 27, 29, 39, 44 read with Section 50 and 51 of the Wild Life
(Protection) Act.
2.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the
respondent-State.
3.
The factual matrix of the case is that on 24.05.2022,
the respondent-Forest Range Officer submitted a wildlife offence
3
report alleging that accused Nos.1 and 2 have been arrested
nearby Bendagodu check-post when they have carried two dead
monitor lizard and a live monitor lizard which are hunted
unauthorisedly and an old stuffed skin of deer in a plastic bag on
a motor bike and they have been arrested at the spot and during
the course of enquiry, they discloses their names and this
petitioner was absconded from the spot. Based on the
complaint, the case was registered against this petitioner along
with other accused persons for the aforesaid offences.
4.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
would submit that this petitioner was not there at the spot and
the specific allegation is against accused Nos.1 and 2 since they
were in a position of meat and only wildlife report is also placed
before the Court in that there is no specific allegation against
this petitioner that he had indulged in committing the aforesaid
offences and accused Nos.1 and 2 have been enlarged on bail
before the Trial Court and prayed to allow the petition.
5.
Per contra, the learned High Court Government
Pleader appearing for the State would submit that in the
complaint, an allegation is made that this petitioner is absconded
4
from the spot and accused Nos.1 and 2 have been arrested when
they were in a position of meat and also the skin of a deer in a
plastic bag hence, there is a prima facie case against this
petitioner and prayed to dismiss the petition.
6.
Having heard the respective counsel appearing for
the parties and also on perusal of the material available on
record it discloses that accused Nos.1 and 2 have been arrested
at the spot and only allegation against this petitioner is that he
absconded from the spot and the role of this petitioner in the
alleged crime is not stated in the report. When such being the
case, having taken note of the allegation made against this
petitioner and accusations made in the complaint, it is a fit case
to exercise the discretion in favour of the petitioner.
7.
In view of the discussions made above, I pass the
following:
ORDER
The
petition
is
allowed.
Consequently,
the
petitioner/accused No.3 shall be released on bail in the event of
his arrest in connection with WLOR No.03/2022-23 registered by
the Range Forest Officer, Doddalanahalli Branch, Kanakapura
5
Taluk, Ramanagara District for the offences punishable under
Sections 9, 27, 29, 39, 44 read with Section 50 and 51 of the
Wild Life (Protection) Act, subject to the following conditions:-
(i)
The petitioner shall surrender himself before
the Investigating Officer within ten days from
the date of receipt of a certified copy of this
order and shall execute a personal bond for a
sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs only)
with two sureties for the like-sum to the
satisfaction of the concerned Investigating
Officer.
(ii)
The petitioner shall not indulge in hampering
the investigation or tampering the prosecution
witnesses.
(iii)
The
petitioner
shall
co-operate
with
the
Investigating
Officer
to
complete
the
investigation and he shall appear before the
Investigating Officer, as and when called for.
(iv)
The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction
without prior permission of the Investigating
Officer till the charge sheet is filed or for a
period of three months, whichever is earlier.
6
(v)
The petitioner shall mark his attendanc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.