SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 42014

SRI HARISH N – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE – Respondent


The petitioner is before this Court seeking anticipatory bail

under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. aggrieved by its rejection by the

Principal District and Sessions Judge, Davangere in Crime

No.43 of 2022 registered for offences punishable under Sections

506, 34, 498A, 504 and 323 of the IPC.

2. Heard Sri C.Raju, learned counsel appearing for the

petitioner and Sri R.D. Ranukaradhya, learned High Court

Government Pleader for the respondent.

3

3. Facts in brief are as follows:-

The petitioner and one Smt. G. Chaitra got married on

15.05.2015. On the relationship turning sore, a complaint is

registered on 5-03-2022 by the complainant alleging harassment

both physical and mental by the petitioner and his family

members. That the complaint results in registration of crime in

Crime No.43 of 2022 for offences punishable under Sections

506, 34, 498A, 504 and 323 of the IPC. On registration of crime,

the petitioner and his parents filed an application before the

learned Sessions Judge under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. seeking

anticipatory bail in Criminal Miscellaneous No.253 of 2022. The

learned Sessions Judge by an order dated 1-04-2022 grants

anticipatory bail to accused Nos. 2 and 3, pa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top