MISS NAVYA P ACHARYA – Appellant
Versus
MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER – Respondent
The petitioner submitted an application with Respondent
No.1 for grant of Trade License for the purpose of starting a
Dosa Canteen. Respondent No.1 after conducting spot
inspection rejected the application of the petitioner by issuing
the impugned endorsements, at Annexures-A, B and C for the
following reasons: (i) there is no provision for discharge of
sewage water; (ii) the premises in which the petitioner
intends to carry on Dosa Canteen measures 127 sq.ft. and the
same is insufficient to carry on the Dosa Canteen; (iii) there
are no proper facilities provided by the petitioner to run the
Dosa Canteen.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner has provided the facilities for discharge of sewage
3
water, which is evident from the representation submitted to
the first respondent at Annexure-L dated 11.11.2021. He
further submits that the reasons assigned for rejecting the
application submitted by the petitioner is contrary to the
provisions contained in the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964
(for short, KMA Act). He further submits that Respondent
No.1 has granted Trade Licenses in respect of the similarly
situated persons. Hence, the impugned endorsement
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.