SMT. V. LALITHAMMA – Appellant
Versus
THE CHIEF MANAGER – Respondent
The petitioner aggrieved by the order dated
15.02.2019, passed in O.S.No.116/2016, by the LIX
3
Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-
60), has filed this writ petition.
2. Brief facts leading rise to filing of this petition
are as under:
Petitioner filed a suit in O.S.No.116/2016 for
mandatory
injunction
against
the
respondents.
Respondents No.1 and 3 filed written statement
separately. The Trial Court on the basis of pleadings
of parties, framed issues. Petitioner was examined as
PW-1
and
was
duly
cross-examined
by
the
respondents. Petitioner closed his side. The official of
respondent No.1 was examined as DW-1. During the
course of cross-examination, certain questions were
asked to DW-1 for which he tried to look into the
office file he had brought along with him to answer
the same. Petitioner raised objection stating that the
witness is not permitted to refer the office file. The
Trial Court overruled the objection and permitted DW-
4
1 to refer the file brought by him. Aggrieved by the
same, petitioner has filed this writ petition.
3. Notice was issued to respondent No.1.
Inspite of service of notice, respondent No.1 remained
unrepresented. Insofar as re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.