KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
MR K J SHAIBE JOSE – Appellant
Versus
MR T N SUKUMARAN – Respondent
The
present
petitioner
was
accused
in
C.C.No.389/2005, in the Court of the learned Civil Judge &
J.M.F.C., Somwarpet, (hereinafter for brevity referred to as
the `trial Court'). By its judgment dated 27.09.2013, the
trial Court convicted the accused for the offence
punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments
Act, 1881 (hereinafter for brevity referred to as `N.I.Act9)
and sentenced him accordingly.
2. The summary of the case of the complainant in the
trial Court was that on 12.03.2004, the accused who was a
known person to him, for his family necessity and to
secure a job for his sister, had availed a loan of a sum of
`5 lakhs, promising to repay the same within two months.
On the very same day, while availing the loan, the accused
had given a post-dated cheque with the date 13.05.2004
3
for the said amount. After the agreed period, when the
said cheque was presented for its realisation, the same
came to be returned with the Banker's endorsement as
`funds insufficient' in the drawer's account. Thereafter,
he issued a legal notice to the accused both under
Registered
Post
Acknowledgement
Due
and
under
Certificate of Posting. The notice sent through Registered
Post
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.