SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 39196

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

DHARWAD BENCH

DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.102084/2019

C/W.

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.102085/2019

IN CRL.P.NO.102084/2019

BETWEEN:

IMMAMHUSAIN S/O. BABUSAB HANABRATTI

AGED ABOUT: 46 YEARS,

OCC: PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHER,

R/O: NEGINHAL TQ: BAILHONGAL,

NOW WORKING KHPS, GODHOLI,

TQ: KHANAPUR, DIST.: BELAGAVI

...PETITIONER.

(BY SHRI VIJAY S CHINIWAR, ADVOCATE.)

AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

THROUGH GOKAK P.S.

REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

BENCH AT: DHARWAD

2.

SMT. DILSHAD @ DILSHADBEGAM

D/O ALLASAB DALAWARNAIK

AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: GOVT. TEACHER,

R/O: MOKASHI GALLI, GOKAK

2

NOW AT R/O: BANAHATTI,

R/O. JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOTE.

…RESPONDENTS.

(BY SHRI PRAVEEN K. UPPAR, HCGP FOR R.1;

R.2 – NOTICE SERVED.)

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973, SEEKING TO QUASH THE

ENTIRE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.1919/2014 REGISTERED

FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 498A, 323, 504,

506 OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860, PENDING ON THE FILE OF

THE PRL. JMFC COURT, GOKAK, VIDE ANNEXURE-A, CONSEQUENTLY

BY QUASHING THE COMPLAINT, FIR AND CHARGE, AT VIDE

ANNEXURE-B, B1 AND B2 RESPECTIVELY, ETC.,.

IN CRL.P.NO.102085/2019

BETWEEN:

IMAMHUSAIN S/O BABUSAB HANABRATTI

AGED ABOUT: 48 YEARS,

OCC: PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHER,

R/O: NEGINHAL, TQ: BAILHONGAL,

NOW WORKING KHPS, GODHOLI,

TQ: KHANAPUR, DIST: BELAGAVI

…PETITIONER.

(BY SHRI VIJAY S CHINIWAR, ADVOCATE.)

AND:

1.

SMT. DILSHADBEGAUM

D/O ALLASAB DALAWARNAIK

AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: GOVT. PRIMARY

SCHOOL TEACHER,

R/O: BANAHATTI, TQ: JAMAKHANDI,

DIST: BAGALKOTE.

3

2.

MOHAMMADSADIQ

S/O IMAMHUSSAID HANABRATTI

AGE: 14 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,

R/O: BANAHATTI,

TQ. JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOTE.

3.

KUMARI ALPHIA

D/O IMAMHUSSAIN HANABRATTI

AGE: 12 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,

R/O: BANAHATTI, TQ: JAMAKHANDI,

DIST: BAGALKOTE.

4.

KUMARI TANGILA

D/O IMAMHUSSAIN HANABRATTI

AGE: 11 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,

R/O: BANAHATTI, TQ: JAMAKHANDI,

DIST: BAGALKOTE.

RESPONDENTS NO.2 TO 4 ARE MINOR,

AND THEY REPRESENTED BY

NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER/

RESPONDENT NO.1

…RESPONDENTS.

(R.1 – NOTICE SERVED;

R.2 TO R.4 – MINOR, REP. BY R.1.)

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973, SEEKING TO QUASH THE

ENTIRE

PROCEEDINGS

FILED

BY

THE

RESPONDENTS

UNDER

SECTION

12

OF

THE

DOMESTIC

VIOLENCE

ACT,

IN

CRL.MISC.NO.59/2017 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE &

JMFC COURT, BANAHATTI, VIDE ANNEXURE-A, ETC.,.

THESE PETITIONS HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR

ORDERS ON 11.1.2022, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF

ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

4

The Criminal Petition No.102084 of 2019 is filed seeking

quashing of proceedings in C.C.No.1919 of 2014 registered for

the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 323, 504 and 506

of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, pending before the Principal

JMFC Court, Gokak. Criminal Petition No.102085 of 2019 is filed

seeking quashing of proceedings registered under Section 12 of

the Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (‘the Act’ for short) in Criminal

Miscellaneous No.59 of 2017 pending before the Civil Judge and

JMFC, Banahalli.

Both these petitions are clubbed together and taken

up for disposal in the light of the fact that the parties to the lis

in both these cases are same and the facts giving rise to the

impugned proceedings are also same. In this order the parties

will be referred to as obtaining in Criminal Petition No.102084 of

2019.

In Criminal Petition No.102084 of 2019 petitioner is

the husband of the 2nd respondent/complainant. Marriage

between the petitioner and the 2nd respondent took place on

5

18.3.2001 and from out of the wedlock it appears that the

couple has three children. The relationship between the

petitioner and the 2nd respondent did not go well and ended in

divorce on 20.1.2007 in accordance with the customs of parties.

After divorce between the petitioner and the 2nd

respondent, the 2nd respondent files a complaint before the

jurisdictional police at Gokak Town against the petitioner and his

mother alleging offences punishable under Sections 323, 504,

498A and 506 of the IPC. The proceedings after filing of the

charge sheet were in C.C.No.1639 of 2017. After a full-fledged

trial, the petitioner and his mother were acquitted of the

offences by an order dated 8.7.2013. This order of acquittal

became final.

5.

During the same time when the 2nd respondent had

registered a complaint before the jurisdictional police at Gokak,

she had also registered a complaint on 16.5.2007 in Marihal

Police Station against the petitioner, his mother and brother

alleging offences punishable under Sections 498A, 506 read with

Section 34 of the IPC. Cognizance was taken in this proceeding

as well in C.C.No.1889 of 2007 and after a full-fledged trial, the

6

petitioner and other family members of the petitioner were

acquitted of the offences. This acquittal also became final.

6.

A third complaint had been registered by the 2nd

respondent/wife at a different police station on 12.9.2007 for

the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 506 and 307 of

the IPC. Since the offence under Section 307 was made, it

became a Sessions Case in S.C.No.32 of 2008. This also ended

in acquittal of the petitioner for the alleged offence. Therefore,

three proceedings were instituted by the 2nd respondent/wife

and all three were after divorce. In those proceedings the

petitioner and his family members were acquitted of whatever

offences that were alleged in all three proceedings and all the

three acquittals have become final. After the aforesaid acquittals

attaining finality, the 2nd respondent again files a complaint

before the Police at Gokok Police Station in Crime No.396 of

2013 for offences punishable under Section 498A, 323, 504 and

506 of the IPC in which cognizance is taken and proceedings are

pending in C.C.No.1919 of 2014 before the learned Magistrate

at Gokok. It is this proceeding that is called in question in the

subject Criminal Petition.

7

7.

Criminal Petition No.102085 of 2019 also arise out

of the very marriage between the petitioner and the 2nd

respondent. This time the proceedings are initiated invoking the

provisions of the Act in Criminal Miscellaneous No.59 of 2017 for

the offence punishable under Section 12 of the Act. Other facts

that are narrated in the connected criminal petition being

identical are not reiterated. The proceedings under the Act are

called in question on the ground that there cannot be invocation

of Act in the year 2017 ten years after the divorce between the

petitioner and the 2nd respondent.

8.

Heard the learned cou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top