SRI.DINAKARA SUVARNA – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – Respondent
DATED
14.08.2014.
THIS ITA, HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR
JUDGMENT
ON
14.06.2022
COMING
ON
FOR
PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGMENT, THIS DAY, P.S.DINESH
KUMAR J, PRONOUNCED THE FOLLOWING:-
JUDGEMENT
These appeals have been admitted to
consider following questions of law:
" a) whether the Tribunal is correct in law in
upholding the action of the assessing officer
in reopening the assessment under Section
147 of the Act for the assessment years
2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08 on the facts
and circumstances of the case?
b) Whether Tribunal erred in law in not
holding that there was no reason to believe
that income escaped assessment and all
mandatory
conditions
to
reopen
the
assessment under Section 147 of the Act
were
not
satisfied
on
the
facts
and
circumstances of the case?
3
c) Whether the Tribunal was correct in law in
reversing
the
deletion
made
by
the
Commissioner of Income Tax [Appeals] of the
addition under Section 69B in respect of
alleged unexplained investments made in
properties
of
Rs.
28,75,500/-
for
the
assessment year 2007-08 on the facts and
circumstances of the case? =
2. Brief facts of the case are, the assessee is
an individual who carries out contract works. He
filed ret
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.