2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 37758
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE Mrs. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
WRIT PETITION No.241/2018 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
M/S. RAMANANDA GAS AGENCY,
GOURIBIDANUR TOWN AND TALUK,
CHICKBALLAPUR DISTRICT 3 562 101.
BY ITS PROPRIETOR
G.N. ANAND BABU.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI SHIVARAMU H.C., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
CHICKBALLAPUR DISTRICT,
CHICKBALLAPUR 3 562 101.
2.
THE THASILDAR,
GOURIBIDANUR TALUK,
GOURIBIDANUR,
CHICKBALLAPUR DISTRICT 3 561 208.
3.
PRASHANTH NAGAR NIVASIGALA
ABHIVRUDDI SANGHA,
GOURIBIDANUR 3 561 208
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
4.
THE PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,
GANGASANDRA GRAM PANCHAYATH,
GOURIBIDANUR TALUK,
CHICKBALLAPUR DISTRICT.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. JYOTHI BHAT, HCGP FOR R-1 AND R-2;
SRI K. PATEL MUNEGOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R-3)
- 2 -
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE
NOTICE
DATED
27.02.2017/17.08.2017
ISSUED
BY
R-2
PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-D.
THIS
WRIT
PETITION
HAVING
BEEN
HEARD
AND
RESERVED ON 28/10/2022 FOR ORDERS AND COMING FOR
PRONOUNCEMENT
OF
DAY,
THE
COURT
PRONOUNCED THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
The petitioner in this writ petition is seeking a writ
of certiorari to quash the notice dated 27/02/2017 3
17/08/2017
issued
by
2nd
respondent
in
No.Food/CR/41/2016-17 produced at Annexure 3 D,
whereby 2nd respondent in the guise of notice has
directed the petitioner to shift the gas godown from the
present premises to any another suitable premises.
The facts leading to filing of this writ petition
is that the petitioner is the owner of the land having
purchased the converted property in the year 1986 in
Sy.Nos.26/2 and 27/2 totally measuring 29.46 mtrs.
East-West and 25.9 mtrs. South-West and built up area
is 9.10 mtrs.x 6.10 mtrs., safety distance left 10.18
- 3 -
mtrs. x 9.95 mtrs. The petitioner, on purchase of the
land on 21/04/1986 obtained licence from the Kalludi
Gram Panchayat to construct a LPG Godown for the
purpose of carrying on the business and accordingly,
licence was granted. It is stated by the petitioner that
before
obtaining
the
licence
from
Kalludy
Gram
Panchayat, the prime requirement was of obtaining no
objection certificate from the Department of Fire and no
objection from the Controller, Department of Explosives
along with the drawing which was approved by the
Deputy Chief Controller of Explosives, Madras on
16/07/1986 and along with the plan permission and the
same was obtained by the petitioner. It is stated that
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited issued the
dealership appointment letter dated 07/08/1986 to the
petitioner and the petitioner started its business from
14/08/1986 as per the terms and conditions of letter of
agreement as was entered into and the same has been
renewed
from
time
to
time
and
the
dealership
- 4 -
agreement is valid. It is stated by the petitioner that as
per the Rule, the building in question has been insured
from time to time and the same is valid. The storage
capacity of the godown is 8,000 kgs.m of LPG and the
validity of the same has been extended which is
described in Form No.F produced at Annexure 3 A
wherein the minimum requirement is 7 mtrs. distance
from the surrounding area of the godown has to be
maintained in accordance with the conditions of the
licence issued by the Competent Authority. It is stated
by the petitioner that an complaint/representation was
lodged by one Prashanth Nagar Nivasigala Abhivruddi
Sangha/3rd respondent (hereinafter referred to as <the
Sangha= for short) registered on 15/04/2003 which is
not in anyway obstructing or causing any nuisance to
the public at large and on the same day a representation
was also given to the local MLA as per Annexure 3 B1
and the same has been endorsed by the MLA., whereby
the
MLA
forwarded
the
representation
to
2nd
- 5 -
respondent/Tahsildar to examine and take action to
change the location of the godown. Based on which, on
10/01/2016, the Deputy Director of Food and Civil
Supplies communicated to 2nd respondent to hold
enquiry for taking appropriate action as per Annexure 3
B2.
Thereafter, the Food Inspector inspected the
premises and drawn a mahazar in the presence of the
public and also in the presence of the petitioner and
recorded a statement of both the parties on the same
day and submitted a report to 2nd respondent as per
Annexure 3 C and based on the same, the Tahsildar
issued a readymade notice dated 27/02/2017 which is
again re-dated as 17/08/2017 informing that respondent
had orally informed to the petitioner to shift the
business premises on 31/12/2016 and therefore directed
the petitioner to shift the business premises to the new
place where there is no movement of public vide
Annexure 3 D which was received through registered
- 6 -
post on 30/08/2017. It is also stated that the petitioner
is carrying on the business since 1986 as per the norms
prescribed under the Explosives Act by maintaining the
minimum
distance
prescribed
under
the
licensing
condition, any license that is going to be issued by the
4th respondent without maintainin