SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 52555

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF APRIL, 2022

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

W.P. NO.6547 OF 2021 (GM-CPC)

BETWEEN:

1 . SHAIK MASTAN MEHABOOB JAN

S/O LATE KHALEEL-UR-REHMAN @ MEHBOOB JAN

AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS

R/AT NO. 24/1-2

2 . MOHEMMAD SADATH MEHABOOB JAN

S/O LATE KHALEEL-UR-REHMAN @ MEHBOOB JAN

AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS

R/AT NO. 24/1-2

3 . MASOOD MEHABOOB JAN

S/O LATE KHALEEL-UR-REHMAN @ MEHBOOB JAN

AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS

PETITIONERS 1 TO 3 ARE R/AT NO. 24/1-2

BORE BANK ROAD, BENSON TOWN

BENGALURU – 560046

PETITIONERS 1 TO 3 ARE REP. BY THEIR

GPA HOLDER

MR. AFZAL RAHMAN JAN

AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS

S/O LATE KHALEEL-UR-REHMAN @ MEHABOOB JAN

NO. 24/1-2, BORE BANK ROAD,

BENSON TOWN

BENGALURU - 560046

2

...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI SURESH S LOKRE, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR

SRI SHRAVAN S LOKRE, ADVOCATE)

AND

1 .

MR. T R SHEKHAR

S/O LATE T RAMACHANDRA

AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS

R/AT NO. 309, 7TH ‘A’ MAIN

1ST BLOCK, HRBR LAYOUT

KALYANAGAR

BENGALURU – 560 043.

2 .

MRS. T R REKHA

D/O LATE RAMACHANDRA

AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS

R/AT NO. 108, COLES ROAD,

FRAZER TOWN

BENGALURU – 560 005.

3 .

MRS. T R NANDINI

D/O LATE RAMACHANDRA

AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS

R/AT CHANNAPPA COMPOUND

KADUGONDANAHALLI

ARABIC COLLEGE POST

BENGALURU – 560 025

4 .

MRS. MEERA SUBAIAH

W/O LATE T R HARISH

AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS

R/AT FLAT NO.6, METROPOLITAN APARTMENTS

HAINES ROAD, FRAZER TOWN

BENGALURU – 560005.

5 .

MR. FAZLUR REHAMAN @ AMEER JAN

S/O LATE M A LATHEEF

AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS

3

6 .

MR. AZEER-UR-REHMAN@ AHMED JAN

S/O LATE M A LATHEEF

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS

7 .

MR. IMTIAZ JAN

S/O LATE M A LATHEEF

AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS

8 .

MR. RAHAMATH ABDUL LATHEEF

S/O LATE M A LATHEEF

AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS

9 .

MR. SHAHNAWA MOHD. ABDUL LATHEEF

S/OLATE M A LATHEEF

AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS

RESPONDENT NOS. 5 TO 9 ARE

R/AT NO. 33/2, NEW NO. 33/4

ULSOOR ROAD,

BENGALURU 560042.

AND ALSO AT NO.16

XAVIER LAYOUT, 4TH CROSS

BENGLAURU 560047

10 . MR. AFZAL REHMAN JAN

S/O LATE KHALEEL-UR-REHMAN @ MEHBOOB JAN

AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS

R/AT NO. 24/1-2, BORE BANK ROD,

BENSON TOWN

BENGALURU – 560 046

11 . MR. AZHAR

S/O AHMED JAN

AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS

12 . MR. ASIM

S/O AHMED JAN

4

AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS

13 . MR. REHAN

S/O AHMED JAN

AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS

RESPONDENT NOS. 11 TO 13 AE

R/AT NO. 33/2, NEW NO. 34/4

ULSOORE ROAD,

BENGLAURU – 560042

AND ALSO AT NO.16

XAVIER LAYOUT, 4TH CROSS

BENGALURU - 560047

....RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI SUNEEL S NARAYAN, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO 4;

NOTICE TO R5 TO 13 IS DISPENSED WITH)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND

227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE

IMPUGNED

DATED

22.03.2021

ON

I.A.NO.4

IN

EX.P.NO.15135/2020 PASSED BY THE V ADDITIONAL SMALL

CAUSES JUDGE AND XXIV ACMM, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES MAYO

HALL UNIT, BENGALURU VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND CONSEQUENTLY

ALLOW THE APPLICATION IN I.A.NO.4

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN

'B' GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed by the judgment debtors 7 to 9 in

Execution Petition No.15135 of 2020, on the file of V Additional

Small Causes Judge and XXIV ACMM Court of Small Causes,

5

Mayo Hall Unit, Bengaluru, challenging the order dated

22.03.2021, dismissing the application-IA.4.

2.

Respondents

1

to

have

initiated

eviction

proceedings against the defendants in SC No.15307 of 2017 and

the trial Court by judgment dated 14.03.2019 allowed the

petition directing the defendants 1 to 12 to quit and deliver

vacant possession of the suit schedule property to the plaintiffs

within thirty days from the date of the order. Thereafter, the

decree holder has filed Execution Petition No.15135 of 2020. In

the said execution proceedings, the Executing Court has passed

the

impugned

order

dated

22.03.2021,

dismissing

the

application filed by the judgment debtors seeking recalling the

delivery warrant.

3.

During the course of the proceedings the petitioners

herein, who are judgment debtors 7 to 9 have filed affidavit of

undertaking and paragraph 1 of the affidavit reads as under:

“1. I submit that I am the General Power of Attorney

holder representing the petitioners No.1, 2 and 3, and

myself who is shown as respondent No.10 in the petition I

submit that my brothers who are the Petitioners’ No.1, 2

6

and 3 and myself have been in possession of the suit

schedule property and in view of the recent developments

in the Contempt Petition, we have offered to voluntarily

vacate and deliver vacant possession of the suit schedule

property on 15th June, 2022 without driving the plaintiffs

in S.C.No.15307/2017 to seek exeuction proceedings to

remove us. I submit that I am duly authorised and

empowered to enter into this Affidavit binding on the

Petitioners Nos.1, 2 and 3 who are my brothers and we

will not sub-let or sub-lease or underlet the suit schedule

property during this period.”

4.

Heard, Sri. Shravan S. Lokre, learned Senior counsel

appearing for the petitioners. Sri. Suneel S. Narayan, learned

counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 submitted that the

General Power of attorney holder of judgment debtors 7 to 9–

Afzal Rehman Jan, is present before the court.

5.

Considering the fact that the parties to the

proceedings, have settled the matter as the petitioners herein

have agreed to vacate and deliver the vacant possession of the

suit schedule property to the respondents herein on or before

the 15th June 2022, in terms of the affidavit of undertaking

dated 20.04.2022, filed before the court and in that view of the

7

matter, the writ petition is disposed of recording the affidavit of

undertaking made by the petitioners/judgment debtors 7 to 9.

Sri Suneel S. Narayan, learned counsel appearing for the

respondents 1 to 4 submitted that respondents 1 to 4 will not

precipitate the matter before the Executing Court and in the

contempt proceedings till 15.06.2022.

Sd/-

JUDGE

SB

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top