1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.200004/2022
BETWEEN:
Rahul Bhavikatti S/o Rajkumar Bhavikatti,
Age : 21 years, Oc : Labour,
R/o Madkatti Village,
R/at Morambi Village,
Tq : Bhalki, Dist : Bidar.
(Petitioner No.1/Accused No.5
as per charge-sheet)
… Petitioner
(By Sri Rajesh Doddamani, Advocate)
AND:
The State of Karnataka,
Through Khatak Chincholi Police Station,
Now represented by the
Additional State Public Prosecutor,
High Court of Karnataka,
Kalaburagi Bench.
… Respondent
(By Sri Sharanabasappa M.Patil, HCGP)
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 439 of
Cr.P.C. praying to allow this petition and release the
2
petitioner/accused No.5 as per charge sheet on bail in
connection with the Crime No.12/2020 of Khatak Chincholi
Police Station registered for the offences punishable under
Sections 143, 144, 147, 148, 323, 324, 504, 506, 302 and
201 r/w 149 of IPC now pending on the file of the Hon'ble
District and Sessions Judge, Bidar in S.C.No.77/2021.
This petition coming on for Orders this day, the
Court made the following:
BAIL - SECTION 302 IPC - [ACCUSED CHARGED UNDER SECTION 323 AND 324 IPC IS ENTITLED TO BAIL]
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was arrested in connection with a murder case and was charged with offences punishable under Sections 143, 144, 147, 148, 323, 324, 504, 506, 302 and 201 read with Section 149 of IPC. The petitioner filed a bail application before the High Court, contending that he was only liable for the offences punishable under Sections 323 and 324 read with Section 149 of IPC and not Section 302 of IPC.
Finding of the Court:
The High Court allowed the bail application, holding that the petitioner was entitled to bail as per the charge-sheet, which showed that he was only liable for the offences punishable under Sections 323 and 324 read with Section 149 of IPC. The Court also noted that accused Nos.3 and 4, who were charged with the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC, had also been granted bail by the Court.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to bail considering the charges against him.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the petitioner was entitled to bail as per the charge-sheet, which showed that he was only liable for the offences punishable under Sections 323 and 324 read with Section 149 of IPC. The Court also noted that accused Nos.3 and 4, who were charged with the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC, had also been granted bail by the Court.
Final Decision: The petition was allowed, and the petitioner was ordered to be released on bail subject to certain conditions.
Heard Sri Rajesh Doddamani, learned counsel for the
petitioner and learned HCGP Sri Gururaj V.Hasilkar for
respondent/State.
2.
The present petition is filed under Section 439
of Cr.P.C with the following prayer :-
To
allow
the
petition
and
the
petitioner/accused No.5 as per charge sheet
on bail in connection with the Crime
No.12/2020
of
Khatak
Chincholi
Police
Station
registered
for
the
offences
punishable under Sections 143, 144, 147,
148, 323, 324, 504, 506, 302 and 201 r/w
149 of IPC now pending on the file of the
Hon'ble District and Sessions Judge, Bidar in
S.C.No.77/2021.
3
3.
Brief facts of the case are as under :-
A complaint came to be lodged on 31.12.2020
contending that on 26.12.2020 at about 6.30 p.m. younger
brother of the complainant Ravi left Madakatti village and
did not returned back and at about 8.30 p.m. when he
telephoned to him and told him to return home. He has
told that he will finish his dinner and return home little
later. Subsequent thereto, when he did not returned,
complainant again called him but there was no response
and mobile phone of his younger brother was switched off.
Thereafter, he searched for his younger brother in the
village and neighboring village but his younger brother was
not found. Accordingly, a missing complaint came to be
lodged. On 30.12.2021 at about 8.30 p.m. Katack
Chincholi police telephoned to him and told that there is a
dead body in the forest area he was required to visit the
forest to identify the dead body. Accordingly, himself, his
mother Renuka together went to the police station and
from there they visited the forest area and there they
found a dead body and they identified that it is the dead
4
body of his younger brother Ravi and lodged a complaint
for taking action. Police after registering of the case in
Crime No.109/2020, were in investigation and later on
they found five persons were responsible for the death of
Ravi including the petitioner and they filed a charge-sheet
before the court for the offences punishable under Sections
143, 144, 147, 148, 323, 324, 504, 506, 302 and 201 read
with Section 149 of IPC against accused Nos.1 to 4 and so
also Section 143, 144, 147, 148, 323, 324, 504 and 506
read with Section 149 of IPC for accused No.5 (for the
present petitioner).
4.
Accused No.5/petiioner is in custody since
24.06.2021. He applied for bail before the District Court
which was rejected. Therefore, he has approached this
court for grant of bail.
5.
Sri Rajesh Doddamani learned counsel for the
petitioner contends that even according to the prosecution
as per the charge-sheet in column No.17 this present
petitioner is liable for the offences punishable under
5
Sections 323 and 324 read with Section 149 of IPC and not
Section 302 of IPC. Therefore, the present petitioner is
entitled for grant of bail. Despite in column No.17 showing
that accused/present petitioner is only liable for the
offence as aforesaid, he has been detained in the custody
and therefore sought for grant of bail.
6.
Per contra, learned High Court Government
Pleader opposes the bail petition. He has also contended
that accused/petitioner is liable for the offence punishable
under Section 302 of IPC. In reply, learned counsel
Sri Rajesh Doddamni also contend that the statement of
the objections filed by the prosecution is to be considered,
this Court has granted bail to accused Nos.3 and 4 by
order dated 30.07.2021 and therefore present petition is
also entitled for grant of bail on the ground of parity.
7.
This court perused the material on record.
Admittedly,
as
per
charge-sheet
in column No.17,
accused/present petitioner is charge sheeted for the
offences punishable under Sections 143, 144, 147, 148,
6
323, 324, 504 and 506 read with Section 149 of IPC.
Moreover, accused Nos.3, 4 who have charge-sheeted for
the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC, they
have also been granted bail by this Court.
8.
Keeping note of these aspects of the matter
without holding a mini trial on me
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.