SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
V SRISHANANDA
RAHUL BHAVIKATTI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Heard Sri Rajesh Doddamani, learned counsel for the

petitioner and learned HCGP Sri Gururaj V.Hasilkar for

respondent/State.

2.

The present petition is filed under Section 439

of Cr.P.C with the following prayer :-

To

allow

the

petition

and

the

petitioner/accused No.5 as per charge sheet

on bail in connection with the Crime

No.12/2020

of

Khatak

Chincholi

Police

Station

registered

for

the

offences

punishable under Sections 143, 144, 147,

148, 323, 324, 504, 506, 302 and 201 r/w

149 of IPC now pending on the file of the

Hon'ble District and Sessions Judge, Bidar in

S.C.No.77/2021.

3

3.

Brief facts of the case are as under :-

A complaint came to be lodged on 31.12.2020

contending that on 26.12.2020 at about 6.30 p.m. younger

brother of the complainant Ravi left Madakatti village and

did not returned back and at about 8.30 p.m. when he

telephoned to him and told him to return home. He has

told that he will finish his dinner and return home little

later. Subsequent thereto, when he did not returned,

complainant again called him but there was no response

and mobile phone of his younger brother was switched off.

Thereafter, he searched for his younger brother in the

village and neighboring v

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top