SHIVARAJU – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER – Respondent
DATED
17.01.2022
PASSED
IN
W.A.NO.850/2021 (SC/ST) CONSIDERING THE GROUNDS RAISED
HEREIN.
THIS PETITION HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR
ORDERS ON 17.06.2022, THIS DAY, RAVI V. HOSMANI J.,
PRONOUNCED THE FOLLOWING:
- 4 -
ORDER
Challenging judgment dated 17.01.2022 passed by
Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.850/2021, this review
petition is filed.
Heard learned counsel for review applicant as well
as learned Additional Government Advocate for Respondent
Nos. 1 and 2 and learned counsel for Respondent Nos. 7 and 8.
The appearance of Respondent Nos. 3 to 6 is dispensed, as
they were not contesting parties in the writ petition and writ
appeal being the legal heirs of original allottees.
Sri. Jayakumar S. Patil, learned Senior Counsel
appearing for Sri. Raveendra V. Reddy, Advocate for review
petitioners
submitted
that
review
petitioners
are
legal
representatives of Laguma @ Dekka, who was originally
granted land bearing Sy.No.94 measuring 2 acres 37 guntas of
Thanisandra village, Krishnarajapuram Hobli, under Darkhast
Rules, on 20.01.1937.
On 16.12.1994, Sri A. Stephen - husband of
respondent no.7, purchased said land from two out of six
children of original grantee, under r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.