NASEEMABI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
Sri. Halesha R.G. learned counsel for appellants and
Sri. Satish Kumar N., learned counsel for respondent have
appeared in person.
For the sake of convenience, the ranking of the
parties is referred to as per their ranking before the
Railway Claims Tribunal Bangalore Bench at Bangalore.
The applicants filed application under Section 16 of
the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 read with Section
124-A of Railways Act, 1989 seeking compensation of
Rs.8,00,000/- (Rupees Eight Lakhs only) with interest for
the death of deceased Ameer Khan who is said to have
died in untoward incident.
The first applicant is the wife and applicants 2 to 5, 7
to 9 are sons and applicants 6 and 8 are the daughters of
the deceased.
4
The applicants narrated the incident that deceased
Ameer Khan travelling from Chikkabanavar to Tumkur by
purchasing
railway
ticket
for
Rs.10/-
vide
ticket
No.11587381 dated 21.01.2012 due to heavy rush in the
train, he must have sat and stood near by the door of the
train and near Tumkur Railway Station he accidentally fell
down from the train and got grievous injuries to his legs
and other parts and immediately shifted by 108 ambulance
and on the way he died. The app
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.