HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA
ABDUL SALIM – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
The petitioner is before this Court calling in question
proceedings
in
C.C.No.4015/2014
registered
for
offences
punishable under Section 354A(1)(v) and Section 509 of the IPC.
2.
Heard Sri. Pratheep C., learned counsel appearing for
the petitioner, Sri. Shankar H.S., learned HCGP appearing for
respondent. Learned counsel appearing for the complainant
though served, remains unrepresented.
3.
Brief facts leading to the filing of present petition, as
borne out from the pleadings, are as follows:
A complaint is registered by the brother of a lady, who
claims to have lost her mobile, which comes in possession of the
petitioner, after which, the petitioner is alleged to have called the
3
lady and spoken such words which would become punishable
under Section 509 of the IPC. A complaint is registered by the
brother of the lady, who had lost her phone and alleged such act
upon the petitioner. The FIR is registered in Crime No.25/2014
for offence punishable under Section 509 of the IPC. The police
after investigation, filed a charge sheet against the petitioner for
offence punishable under Section 509 of the IPC and including
offence punishable under Section 354A(1)(v) of the IPC. The
procee
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.