SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 61182

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA
ABDUL SALIM – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


The petitioner is before this Court calling in question

proceedings

in

C.C.No.4015/2014

registered

for

offences

punishable under Section 354A(1)(v) and Section 509 of the IPC.

2.

Heard Sri. Pratheep C., learned counsel appearing for

the petitioner, Sri. Shankar H.S., learned HCGP appearing for

respondent. Learned counsel appearing for the complainant

though served, remains unrepresented.

3.

Brief facts leading to the filing of present petition, as

borne out from the pleadings, are as follows:

A complaint is registered by the brother of a lady, who

claims to have lost her mobile, which comes in possession of the

petitioner, after which, the petitioner is alleged to have called the

3

lady and spoken such words which would become punishable

under Section 509 of the IPC. A complaint is registered by the

brother of the lady, who had lost her phone and alleged such act

upon the petitioner. The FIR is registered in Crime No.25/2014

for offence punishable under Section 509 of the IPC. The police

after investigation, filed a charge sheet against the petitioner for

offence punishable under Section 509 of the IPC and including

offence punishable under Section 354A(1)(v) of the IPC. The

procee

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top